Ministry of Justice written question – answered at on 14 July 2026.
Grahame Morris
Labour, Easington
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.
Grahame Morris
Labour, Easington
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, to what extent are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline, or allocation of work.
Grahame Morris
Labour, Easington
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
Grahame Morris
Labour, Easington
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps has the Department taken to assess and mitigate risks of bias or discrimination arising from the use of automated decision-making systems.
Jake Richards
Assistant Whip, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice
Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in the loop’. To future-proof the legislation, the Act introduced a number of regulation-making powers to ensure the Government can keep these safeguards effective and up to date in light of evolving technology and changing societal expectations.
The ICO as the independent data protection regulator sets out in its guidance that “human involvement [in the decision making] has to be active and not just a token gesture” to be meaningful”. The ICO is working on updating its guidance in the light of the recent reforms and is working on a Code of Practice on AI and ADM which will provide authoritative guidance in data protection compliance in this area.
The UK’s data protection legislation does not lay down specific rules regarding particular employment systems. It is for each organisation to determine how it applies the data protection framework in its operational context. Where individuals are subject to significant decisions based solely on automated processing, the legislation provides safeguards including rights to information, challenge and human Intervention.
The UK’s data protection legislation is a principles-based framework and does not prescribe specific consultation requirements for particular operational systems. Organisations are responsible for applying the requirements of the legislation within their own operational context and must ensure any processing of personal data complies with applicable legal requirements.
The UK’s data protection legislation applies to any processing of personal data regardless of the technology being used and is underpinned by principles of fairness, transparency and accountability. Organisations using automated decision-making or profiling must ensure processing is fair, lawful and transparent, and may be required to undertake a Data Protection Impact Assessment where processing is likely to result in a high risk to individuals’ rights and freedoms.
Yes1 person thinks so
No0 people think not
Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
An intervention is when the MP making a speech is interrupted by another MP and asked to 'give way' to allow the other MP to intervene on the speech to ask a question or comment on what has just been said.