Ministry of Justice written question – answered at on 23 May 2024.
To ask His Majesty's Government in each of the last five years (1) how many applications have been made to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, (2) in how many cases a review has been completed and a decision been made and, (3) what is the average length of time that the Commission has taken to examine and complete a review.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many case review managers have been employed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission during each of the past five years.
To ask His Majesty's Government what procedure, if any, exists within the Criminal Cases Review Commission for ensuring priority is given to those cases where an applicant has a limited life expectancy, due to age or infirmity.
Information on the number of cases received and completed, and the average duration of a review, is available on the Criminal Cases Review Commission’s (CCRC) website and in their annual report. The table below provides data for the last five complete business years:
Applications Received | Cases Completed | Average Duration of a Review (from allocation to initial decision) | |
2019-20 | 1334 | 1453 | 31.7 weeks |
2020-21 | 1142 | 1109 | 35.1 weeks |
2021-22 | 1198 | 1183 | 34.4 weeks |
2022-23 | 1424 | 1275 | 38.7 weeks |
2023-24 | 1629 | 1441 | 35.1 weeks |
The average number of Case Review Managers over the past five years is as follows:
Year ending 31 March | Case Review Manager Average Headcount |
2019 – 2020 | 30 |
2020 – 2021 | 30 |
2021 – 2022 | 29 |
2022 – 2023 | 29 |
2023 - 2024 | 31 |
Section three of the CCRC’s published Case Review Process policy (CW-POL-04-Case-Review-Process-v3.0.pdf (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com)) outlines that cases are generally allocated in date order of receipt. However, there are several exceptional factors which determine the degree of priority once a case is under review. These assessments are fluid and relative to the needs of other cases. There are several factors for a case to be given higher priority, these include old age (75 years or older) and/or ill health, supported by medical evidence, where there is concern that the applicant may die before the case is dealt with. In addition, evidence that the applicant’s serious ill health (or that of any close family member of the applicant) is directly and significantly aggravated by any delay will also result in the case being given higher priority. The full list of factors for a case to be given a higher priority can be found in the Case Review Process policy.
Yes2 people think so
No1 person thinks not
Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.