Taxation: USA

Treasury written question – answered on 7 February 2023.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Stephen Hammond Stephen Hammond Conservative, Wimbledon

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to paragraph 3.6 of the consultation on implementation of OECD Pillar 2 published on11 January 2022, whether his Department has made an assessment of the implications for his policies of the progress towards the consistent implementation of the rules in the United States; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Gareth Bacon Gareth Bacon Conservative, Orpington

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the consultation on implementation of OECD Pillar 2 published 11 January 2022, and the statement in paragraph 3.6 that the effectiveness of the global rules also depends on a high degree of consistency in the implementation in different jurisdictions, what assessment his Department has made of the progress being made towards the consistent implementation of the rules in the United States; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Victoria Atkins Victoria Atkins The Financial Secretary to the Treasury

The international group representing more than 135 countries that are collaborating to tackle tax avoidance (known as the ‘Inclusive Framework’) have agreed that Pillar 2 implementation is subject to a ‘common approach’. This means that countries that implement Pillar 2 must do so in line with the intended outcomes of the rules, ensuring consistency in implementation. A qualification process for each country that implements Pillar 2 is under discussion by the Inclusive Framework.

The United States have already implemented a tax on low taxed foreign profits called Global Intangible Low Taxed Income (GILTI). The Government recognises that the US has committed to reforming the GILTI rules so that they align with the Pillar 2 rules. How GILTI and Pillar 2 will interact, pending such reform, is being agreed internationally.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.