Royal Fleet Auxiliary

Ministry of Defence written question – answered at on 19 June 2018.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Douglas Chapman Douglas Chapman Shadow SNP Spokesperson (Defence Procurement)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the tender for Royal Fleet Auxiliary fleet solid support ships includes the provision of Phalanx close-range guns and other weaponry; and whether the inclusion of that weaponry allow those ships to be defined as warships.

Photo of Douglas Chapman Douglas Chapman Shadow SNP Spokesperson (Defence Procurement)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what comparisons his Department has undertaken regarding the procurement of Royal Fleet Auxiliary fleet solid support ships with similar ships procured internally by the national navies of (a) France, (b) Germany, (c) Italy and (d) Spain.

Photo of Guto Bebb Guto Bebb The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence

The procurement of the Fleet Solid Support (FSS) ships through international competition reflects the fact that they are Naval Auxiliary Support Ships whose primary role is the replenishment of naval vessels with bulk stores. They are non-combatant ships, manned by civilian Royal Fleet Auxiliary crews and are equipped with weapons solely for self-defence. We are clear that FSS ships are not warships.

We are therefore required by law to procure them through international competition, under our obligations set out in the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 and as outlined in the National Shipbuilding Strategy. It would not be appropriate to comment on the procurement practices of other nations.

The forthcoming tender for the design and build of the FSS ships will not include the provision of the ships' self-defensive weaponry. Sensitive elements of the ships will be included in a customisation package to be procured through a separate competition later in the programme and restricted to UK companies.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes2 people think so

No2 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.