Electronic Surveillance: USA

Department for Culture, Media and Sport written question – answered on 3rd November 2015.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Laird Lord Laird Non-affiliated

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking to examine the key findings of fact by Judge Hogan in the European Court of Justice’s judgment in case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.

Photo of Baroness Neville-Rolfe Baroness Neville-Rolfe The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills

The Government is disappointed with the European Court of Justice judgement in the Schrems case. There is an important principle here that companies must be able to transfer data to third-party countries with appropriate safeguards and we are concerned about the uncertainty this judgement creates.The Government urges the European Commission and US authorities to reach a swift conclusion on their negotiation of a revised agreement.

I recently held a roundtable with business where I listened to theirs reactions and I have agreed to continue engaging with them. I have also been discussing further guidance with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO has made a statement which highlights alternative methods of data transfer to the US with more advice to follow.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.