Land Drainage

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs written question – answered on 23rd February 2015.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of George Hollingbery George Hollingbery Conservative, Meon Valley

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what estimate she has made of the comparative costs of (a) connecting new minor developments to surface water main drainage and (b) utilising sustainable drainage systems for such developments in the next five years.

Photo of Dan Rogerson Dan Rogerson The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Defra Research & Development project WT1505 provides estimates of the comparative costs of sustainable drainage (SuDS) versus conventional drainage (to Building Regulations) for a minor development as follows:

Small site

(<0.2ha, 8 properties, 1 outfall)

Capital (construction) costs

Maintenance costs (per annum)

SuDS (£)

Conventional

(£)

SuDS (£)

Conventional (£)

Cost estimate (SuDS: “normal” permeability)

44,000

59,200

248

188

These estimates relate to what the research classed as “normal” permeability.

Using SuDS on sites with different permeability levels could incur higher or lower construction and maintenance costs. However, under the Government’s approach there is a presumption that conventional approaches to drainage can be used where construction costs would otherwise be higher.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.