We need your support to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can continue to hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

NATO: Unmanned Air Vehicles

Defence written question – answered on 11th June 2012.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Angus Robertson Angus Robertson Shadow SNP Spokesperson (Defence), Shadow SNP Spokesperson (Foreign and Commonwealth Office), Shadow SNP Westminster Group Leader

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what consideration he has given to becoming a full member of the NATO Allied Ground Surveillance System;

(2) if he will estimate the value of UK industrial participation in the NATO Allied Ground Surveillance System;

(3) how much has been spent on the NATO Allied Ground Surveillance System project to date.

Photo of Nick Harvey Nick Harvey The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence

Our requirements for airborne surveillance are met mainly by the SENTINEL system which has been in service since 2009 and provides a capability comparable to the NATO Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS) system. SENTINEL has been accepted by NATO as a contribution in kind to its wider surveillance requirements.

We have not, therefore, elected to join the 14-nation consortium that is acquiring AGS, and have no visibility of the expenditure incurred.

In accordance with NATO convention, only nations that contribute directly to the financing of a capability are entitled to share in the industrial benefits.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.