Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Community Orders

Justice written question – answered on 24th November 2011.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Laurence Robertson Laurence Robertson Chair, Northern Ireland Affairs Committee

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 10 November 2011, Official Report, column 423W, on community orders: voluntary organisations, if he will consider the merits of allowing (a) charities and (b) community amateur sports clubs the opportunity to claim dispensation from charges of community payback fees by the probation authorities; and if he will make a statement.

Photo of Crispin Blunt Crispin Blunt Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice) (Prisons and Probation)

The voluntary sector, including charities and sports clubs, is the largest single beneficiary of Community Payback work. The majority of beneficiary organisations are not currently required to make a contribution to the cost of offender supervision. Where probation trusts, and in future potentially other providers of Community Payback, do seek a contribution towards costs, due regard will be given to the circumstances of the organisation which benefits from the work. There needs to be a proper balance between these organisation's circumstances and the need for Community Payback to work for society as a whole; preventing a disproportionate charge on the taxpayer; and preventing consumption of resources that could be directly targeted on services for direct victims of crime.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.