Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Fluoridation

House of Lords written question – answered on 24th November 2011.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Earl Baldwin of Bewdley Earl Baldwin of Bewdley Crossbench

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the statement by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in its lay summary for licensed product 00036/0103 that this "contains sodium fluoride, which helps prevent tooth decay" indicates that toothpastes with added fluoride require medicinal product licences.

Photo of Earl Howe Earl Howe The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health

It is the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency's (MHRA) view that the presence of fluoride in toothpaste does not, in itself, make the product a medicinal product. Oral hygiene products are permitted by the cosmetics directive to contain fluoride to a maximum strength of 0.15 per cent. Accordingly, the MHRA considers that a toothpaste containing more than 0.15 per cent of fluoride falls within the definition of a medicine, but those with lower concentrations do not.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.