Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Sentencing

Justice written question – answered on 10th February 2010.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Dominic Grieve Dominic Grieve Shadow Secretary of State (Justice)

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people were sentenced for failure to answer bail in 2008; and what the average (a) fine and (b) custodial sentence imposed for such offences was in that period.

Photo of Jack Straw Jack Straw The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

Data held centrally on sentencing show only the sentencing of principal offences. Failure to appear maybe sentenced as a principal offence but can be sentenced with other more serious offences. In such cases the sentence given for failure to appear is not recorded centrally. There were 17,351 cases where a sentence for failure to appear is recorded for 2008. Of these 7,527 received fines and the average fine was £68.52. A further 2,347 received immediate custody and the average sentence length was 25 days.

The requested information is shown in the following table.

The data are presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe.

Total sentenced, average fine and average custodial sentence length for failure to answer bail( 1) , 2008
Number/£
Total sentenced 17,351
Average fine (£) 68.52
Average custodial sentence length (days) 25.0
Absolute discharge 416
Conditional discharge 1,595
Fine 7,527
Community sentence 2,991
Suspended Sentence Order 203
Immediate custody 2,347
Otherwise dealt with 2,272
(1) Bail Act 1976 S.6

Notes:

1. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems.

2. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.