British Coal Compensation

House of Lords written question – answered at on 1 October 2007.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract Labour

asked Her Majesty's Government:

Whether they have made an assessment of the finding in the Coal Health Compensation Schemes report of the National Audit Office, published on 18 July, that through its handling company, Vendside Limited, the Union of Democratic Mineworkers had registered many claims under the British Coal respiratory disease litigation and the British Coal vibration white finger litigation; and, if so, whether each of those claimants would have been required, at some stage, to pay Vendside's fee, notwithstanding the payment of their legal costs by the Department of Trade and Industry.

Photo of Lord Drayson Lord Drayson Minister of State, Ministry of Defence, Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform, Minister of State (Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) (Business and Regulatory Reform), Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) (Defence Equipment and Support) (also Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform)

The department meets the costs of claimants' representatives under the terms of both the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vibration white finger schemes. However, we would not be privy to any additional agreement reached between claimants and their representatives.

The department is aware that there have been instances where Vendside has charged a fee when claimants have entered into an agreement with the Union of Democratic Mineworkers. These fees are not related to the costs paid by the department to claimants' representatives.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes0 people think so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.