Pesticides Safety Directive Study

House of Lords written question – answered on 24th February 2005.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of The Countess of Mar The Countess of Mar Crossbench

asked Her Majesty's Government:

Further to the Written Answer by the Lord Whitty on 4 February (Official Report, cols. WA 68–69), on what evidence from:

(a) human toxicological data;

(b) non-human mammalian toxicological data;

(c) general practitioner medical records;

(d) pesticide company doctor medical records;

(e) Health and Safety Executive Employment Medical Advisory Service medical records;

(f) information provided by the National Poisons Information Service;

(g) data from biochemical investigation tests; and

(h) other information the Pesticides Safety Directorate has concluded that "62 incidents . . . did not demonstrate a causal link between the pesticide and symptoms described".

Photo of Lord Whitty Lord Whitty Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (Food, Farming and Sustainable Energy)

The Pesticides Safety Directorate has not drawn any conclusions from the limited data submitted. The reports provided in response to this exercise do not contain the toxicological data or medical records necessary to demonstrate proof of a causal link. The results of the study have been sent to the Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) and the Health and Safety Executive's Pesticides Incident Appraisal Panel (PIAP) which are currently considering them.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes1 person thinks so

No0 people think not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.