Home Department written statement – made at on 19 December 2012.
Damian Green
Minister of State (Ministry of Justice and Home Office) , The Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice
I have today placed in the library my proposals for the aggregate amount of grant to Local Policing Bodies in England and Wales for 2013-14, for the approval of the House. Copies are also available in the Vote Office.
Today the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) will be publishing proposals for the distribution of Formula Grant to English local authorities for 2013-14. Funding to the police that in previous years was paid via the Local Government Finance Report issued by DCLG will now be paid via the Home Office Police Grant Report. This change reflects the fact that the police are outside the Business Rates Retention Scheme, and confirms my intention that this funding for the police will be permanently transferred to the Home Office in the next spending review.
The Welsh Government will shortly be setting out their proposals for the allocation of funding in 2013-14 for Local Policing Bodies in Wales.
Earlier this month, the Chancellor announced further reductions to departmental budgets for 2013-14 and 2014-15 in his autumn statement. However, I have protected the police from these reductions in 2013-14. In addition, in 2013-14, I have also protected the police from reductions announced by the Chancellor in November 2011 relating to public sector pay restraint. Without this protection on pay restraint, central Government funding for the police would have been reduced by £66 million in 2013-14. As a result of both these decisions, the police will receive the same amount of total Government funding in 2013-14 that was agreed at the October 2010 spending review.
Following the Chancellor’s recent autumn statement, I have decided to defer publication of police funding allocations for 2014-15 in order to fully scrutinise all Home Office budgets.
I have decided to apply damping so that every police force area in 2013-14 will face the same percentage reduction in core central Government funding (1.6% cash). I intend to apply damping in the same way in 2014-15. In making this decision, the Home Secretary and I have carefully considered responses to the recent informal consultation on damping. Many of the responses stressed the need to undertake a full review of the Police allocation formula before changing damping policy given that damping and the formula are inextricably linked. That is why we have decided to continue current damping arrangements and why the Home Secretary will be commissioning a fundamental review of the formula to begin once Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) are established in their roles and able to engage fully in the review process. Determining how funding should be allocated to the police in the future is a complex and important matter which requires careful consideration and will take time. I am also aware that a continuation of existing damping arrangements is the basis on which many Police and Crime Commissioners and police forces are making their financial plans.
We have embarked on the biggest reforms to the policing landscape for 50 years. And 2012 is the year when these reforms start to come together at both the local level with the introduction of Police and Crime Commissioners and at the national level, with the National Crime Agency. In November 2012, we welcomed 41 directly elected Police and Crime Commissioners. These directly elected individuals will have the statutory duty to deliver an efficient and effective police force, which clearly demonstrates value for money and, above all, cut-crime.
Police reform is working. Thanks to the hard work of officers up and down the country, day in and day out, crime is falling even though budgets are reducing. As Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary has made clear, police forces have risen to the existing financial challenge, cutting spending while largely maintaining the service they provide. The proportion of officers on the frontline is increasing, crime continues to fall, victim satisfaction is up and the response to emergency calls is being maintained.
As my decisions on police funding in 2013-14 demonstrate, we are committed to ensuring that the police continue to have the resources they need to carry out their important work. I recognise that the funding settlement remains challenging, but I am confident that PCCs and forces win continue to drive out waste and maintain the level of service that the public expect.
I have set out below how I propose to allocate the police funding settlement between the different funding streams in 2013-14.
| Table 1: Police R evenue F unding - P roposed F igures for 201 3- 14 | |
| 2013-14 | |
| £m | |
| Total General Funding | |
| Comprising | |
| Police Core Settlement | 4725 |
| of which Home Office Police Main Grant | 4540 |
| of which National, International and Capital City Grant (MOPAC only) | 185 |
| DCLG | 3144 |
| of which formula funding | 3067 |
| of which council tax (11/12) freeze grant | 75 |
| of which Ordnance Survey | 2 |
| Welsh Government | 148 |
| Total Home Office Specific Grant | |
| Comprising | |
| Welsh Top-up | 13 |
| Counter Terrorism Specific Grant | 563 |
| NPoCC | 1 |
| PFI Grant | 60 |
| Total Government Funding | 8660(*) |
| % C ash change in Total Government Funding | -1.9%(**) |
| (*)Includes a small amount of contingency funding which is not shown in the table. (**)This is the difference in total central Government funding to the police compared to 2012-13 which included additional funding relating to the PCC elections. The reduction in core Government funding (i.e. funding that is damped) is 1.6%. | |
Provisional allocations of these grants (with the exception of counter-terrorism funding) for each force area in England and Wales for 2013-14 are set out in table 3.
Counter Terrorism
I will continue to allocate specific funding for counter-terrorism policing and have provided a ring-fenced budget for this throughout the spending review period to ensure that critical national counter terrorism capabilities are maintained. We have allocated at least £563 million to support counter-terrorism policing in 2013-14.
PCCs and forces will receive their specific counter-terrorism allocations in the new year. For security reasons, these allocations will not be available in the public domain.
National Police Co - ordination Centre
From 2013-14, I will be providing funding from the police settlement for the National Police Co-ordination Centre (NPoCC) which is being established following a review led by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) into the August 2011 disorder. NPoCC will have three main functions including assessing national capability and capacity in relation to the strategic policing requirement and police national requirements; co-ordinating a continuous testing and exercising regime to ensure effective mobilisation of national assets in a crisis; and brokering mutual aid in a crisis.
Private Finance Initiatives Grant
Specific funding will be given to cover the costs of police private finance initiative projects which are currently operational. This funding was added to the police settlement for this specific purpose. The Home Office will also support the two police PFI projects that are under construction, and which are not yet operational.
Council tax freeze
Funding will be paid in each of the four years of the spending review period to all English Local Policing Bodies who froze the police precept component of council tax in 2011-12. This funding is worth £75 million. Funding for the 2012-13 council tax freeze scheme has been paid from outside the police funding settlement. This will also be the case for future council tax freeze schemes.
Council tax referendums
The Communities Secretary, in consultation with the Home Secretary, will today give an indication of the council tax excessiveness principles he is minded to propose for 2013-14. After considering any representations he will set out the final principles in a report to the House and seek approval for these in parallel with the final report on the local government finance settlement. In Wales, council tax capping is the responsibility of Welsh Ministers.
Neighbourhood Policing Fund
From 2013-14 the Neighbourhood Policing Fund (NPF) has been consolidated into Police Main Grant. The baseline against which damping has been calculated has been adjusted to ensure that final allocations reflect the fact that they had previously been allocated on a different basis to Police Main Grant. This minimises the impact on overall funding allocations to police force areas.
Other funding
Community Safety Fund
The vast Majority of drugs, crime and community safety funding that the Home Office currently provides to a range of partners will cease at the end of this financial year. Instead, PCCs will receive funding from a transitional and unring-fenced Community Safety Fund worth £90 million. The funding has been allocated according to the current allocation of those funding streams which are ending. Force level allocations are set out in table 3. This funding will be rolled into Police Main Grant in 2014-15, and the baseline prior to damping being applied will be adjusted accordingly.
Police Capital
Capital allocations will be as announced in the written ministerial statement laid in January 2012. A portion of capital will continue to be top sliced to fund the National Police Air Service in 2013-14 and 2014-15. These proposed figures are set out in table 2. The National Police Air Service began operations on
| Table 2: Proposed D ivision of P olice C apital between Funding Streams | ||
| 2013-14 | 2014-15 | |
| £m | £m | |
| Capital Grant | 106 | 109 |
| National Police Air Service | 13 | 10 |
| Special Grant Capital | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 120 | 120 |
I still intend to allocate the majority of capital funding directly to Local Policing Bodies. Like last year all Local Policing Bodies will receive the same percentage change in Capital Grant. I will also continue to maintain a capital contingency. These proposed allocations (set out at table 4) are the same as those announced in the written ministerial statement laid in January 2012.
Royal Parks Policing
Funding in respect of policing the royal parks will continue to be provided by the Home Office to the Greater London Authority on behalf of the Mayor’s Office for policing and crime. In 2013-14 a total of £6.9 million will be provided from outside of the police funding settlement.
| Table 3: Provisional R evenue A llocations for England and Wales 2013 - 14 | |||||
| 2013-14 | |||||
| £m | |||||
| Local Policing Body | HO Core | CSF | Welsh Top-up | WG | DCLG |
| Avon and Somerset | 115.8 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 61.5 |
| Bedfordshire | 44.5 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 25.5 |
| Cambridgeshire | 53.7 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 26.5 |
| Cheshire | 68.4 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 49.0 |
| City of London | 20.6 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 37.2 |
| Cleveland | 50.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 42.3 |
| Cumbria | 31.9 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 33.9 |
| Derbyshire | 68.9 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 41.2 |
| Devon and Cornwall | 111.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 68.9 |
| Dorset | 45.9 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 18.8 |
| Durham | 47.3 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 40.6 |
| Dyfed-Powys | 33.9 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 15.0 | 0 |
| Essex | 114.4 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 60.9 |
| Gloucestershire | 38.2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 21.3 |
| Greater London Authority | 1138.4 | 18.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 821.4 |
| Greater Manchester | 248.3 | 6.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 199.0 |
| Gwent | 47.1 | 1.4 | 0 | 32.3 | 0 |
| Hampshire | 133.6 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 68.8 |
| Hertfordshire | 79.5 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 39.6 |
| Humberside | 73.4 | 2.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 51.0 |
| Kent | 118.3 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 72.8 |
| Lancashire | 111.4 | 1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 86.8 |
| Leicestershire | 71.9 | 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 43.3 |
| Lincolnshire | 42.6 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 22.1 |
| Merseyside | 134.7 | 3.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 124.0 |
| Norfolk | 55.9 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 31.4 |
| North Wales | 48.8 | 1.4 | 6.9 | 23.9 | 0 |
| North Yorkshire | 46.3 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 29.6 |
| Northamptonshire | 47.7 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 26.4 |
| Northumbria | 121.2 | 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 118.1 |
| Nottinghamshire | 84.9 | 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 52.6 |
| South Wales | 97.6 | 3.5 | 0 | 76.6 | 0 |
| South Yorkshire | 110.0 | 3.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 84.9 |
| Staffordshire | 73.8 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 43.6 |
| Suffolk | 45.3 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 24.9 |
| Surrey | 69.3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 31.7 |
| Sussex | 108.9 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 58.7 |
| Thames Valley | 155.9 | 3.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 80.4 |
| Warwickshire | 34.5 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 19.0 |
| West Mercia | 73.7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 47.4 |
| West Midlands | 275.3 | 7.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 197.5 |
| West Yorkshire | 187.8 | 5.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 141.7 |
| Wiltshire | 41.7 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 22.5 |
| Total England and Wales | 4725.4 | 90.0 | 12.8 | 147.8 | 3067.2 |
| Table 4: Proposed and Indicative capital Allocations for England and Wales | ||
| Local Policing Body | 2013-14 | 2014-15 |
| £m | ||
| Avon and Somerset | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| Bedfordshire | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Cambridgeshire | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Cheshire | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| City of London | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Cleveland | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Cumbria | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Derbyshire | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Devon and Cornwall | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Dorset | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Durham | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Dyfed-Powys | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Essex | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Gloucestershire | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Greater Manchester | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| Gwent | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Hampshire | 2.7 | 2.8 |
| Hertfordshire | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Humberside | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| Kent | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Lancashire | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Leicestershire | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Lincolnshire | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Merseyside | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Metropolitan | 28.1 | 29.0 |
| Norfolk | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| North Wales | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| North Yorkshire | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Northamptonshire | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Northumbria | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| Nottinghamshire | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| South Wales | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| South Yorkshire | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Staffordshire | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Suffolk | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Surrey | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Sussex | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| Thames Valley | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| Warwickshire | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| West Mercia | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| West Midlands | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| West Yorkshire | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Wiltshire | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| Total England and Wales | 106.0 | 109.3 |
This phrase is often used in written answers to indicate that a minister has deposited some relevant information in the House of Commons Library. Typical content includes research reports, letters, and tables of data not published elsewhere.
A list of such depositions can be found at http://deposits.parliament.uk/ along with some of the documents. The Library is not open to the public, but copies of documents can be requested if they are not on that website. For more information, see the House of Commons factsheet: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/P15.pdf
The Chancellor - also known as "Chancellor of the Exchequer" is responsible as a Minister for the treasury, and for the country's economy. For Example, the Chancellor set taxes and tax rates. The Chancellor is the only MP allowed to drink Alcohol in the House of Commons; s/he is permitted an alcoholic drink while delivering the budget.
The term "majority" is used in two ways in Parliament. Firstly a Government cannot operate effectively unless it can command a majority in the House of Commons - a majority means winning more than 50% of the votes in a division. Should a Government fail to hold the confidence of the House, it has to hold a General Election. Secondly the term can also be used in an election, where it refers to the margin which the candidate with the most votes has over the candidate coming second. To win a seat a candidate need only have a majority of 1.