Home Department written statement – made at on 13 December 2010.
Nick Herbert
Minister of State (Ministry of Justice and Home Office) , The Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice
I have today placed in the library my proposals for the aggregate amount of grant to police authorities (referred to in the report as the Police Core Settlement) in England and Wales for 2011-12, for the approval of the House. I have also given an indication of how I intend to allocate Home Office funding for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15, for which approval will be sought at a later date. My intention in doing so is to provide police forces with the best possible information to support their financial planning.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government has today also set out his proposals for police funding for the next two years. For the second two years, in England, the Local Government Resource Review may have implications for how the wider funding of local government is allocated for police authorities. The review will conclude in July 2011 and will signal the Government's intentions for the future.
The Welsh Assembly Government are also setting out today their proposals for the next two years of funding for the four police authorities in Wales.
To ensure a simple, transparent and equal share of reductions to the Police Core Settlement, funding from the Department for Communities and Local Government and from the Welsh Assembly (which together comprise the Majority of Government funding to police authorities), these allocations have been damped in 2011-12 and 2012-13 at the level of the average reduction.
This means that every police authority will see a cash reduction in this funding of 5.1% in 2011-12 and 6.7% in 2012-13. I understand that the police service is already planning on this basis and-as in previous years-I will ensure that Welsh forces receive equal damping treatment to their English counterparts. When funding for specific grants is added to this, the total cash reduction in core Government funding to the police remains 4% in 2011-12 and 5% in 2012-13, as announced on
Damping levels for the last two years of the settlement will be decided at a later date.
These reductions will be challenging but the Government are clear that forces can make the necessary savings while protecting the front line and prioritising the visibility and availability of policing.
The Government will play their part through continuing work with authorities and forces on value for money, including more effective procurement at national level, greater collaboration between force and other partners, and better use of comparative information; through the removal of unnecessary bureaucracy which adds costs and impedes a sharp focus on front-line policing; through its policy for public sector pay; and through careful consideration in due course of the recommendations from Tom Winsor's current independent review of police remuneration and conditions.
In order to give greater local freedom and flexibility over how resources are deployed locally there will be a significant reduction in the funding allocated by means of specific grants. Specifically, the Rule 2 Grant, Crime Fighting Fund and the Basic Command Unit Fund have all been absorbed within the Police Main Grant.
I will continue to provide a specific Neighbourhood Policing Fund for the first two years of the settlement period. This recognises that neighbourhood policing provides a dedicated, consistent and visible presence in communities. From 2013-14, the new directly elected Police And Crime Commissioners will have full discretion over this funding, recognising their accountability to the communities they serve. In London, the Metropolitan police authority will have full autonomy over this funding from 2011-12, in recognition of the role the Mayor of London and the Deputy Mayor, Policing, already play.
I will also be keeping specific funding for counter-terrorism policing and have provided relative protection to this budget to ensure that critical national counter-terrorism capabilities are maintained. Authorities and forces will receive more details of their specific counter-terrorism allocations in January.
In addition to the Police Core Settlement, the Olympic safety and security budget has been prioritised. These provisions are detailed below.
I have set aside £50 million in 2012-13 to fund the first elections of Police and Crime Commissioners in that year. This amount was specifically included in the police settlement for this purpose and has therefore had no impact on allocations to forces. I have likewise set aside funding for the continuation of police private finance initiative projects.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government will today make a statement on his approach to council tax increases and capping next year. He will also announce details of the outstanding capping action to be taken against Greater Manchester and Nottinghamshire police authorities.
The Police Grant Settlement 2011-12 to 2014-15
I have set out below how I propose to allocate the police settlement between the different funding streams for the next four financial years.
| Table 1: Police revenue funding-proposed figures for 2011-12 and indicative figures for 2012-13 to 2014-15 | ||||
| 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | |
| £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Total Formula Funding: | ||||
| comprising | ||||
| Home Office police main grant | 4,579 | 4,251 | 4,515 | 4,429 |
| National, international and capital city grant (MPS only) | 200 | 189 | 185 | 183 |
| DCLG general grant | 3,345 | 3,138 | 3,093(1) | 3,051(1) |
| WAG general grant | 161 | 151 | 149 | 147 |
| Total Specific Grants | ||||
| comprising | ||||
| Welsh top-up | 13 | 13 | 20 | 20 |
| Neighbourhood Policing Fund (NPF) | 340 | 338 | - | - |
| Counter-terrorism specific grant | 567 | 564 | 563 | 562 |
| Council tax (2011-12) freeze grant | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
| PCC election funding | - | 50 | - | - |
| PFI grants | 54 | 54 | 60 | 79 |
| Total Government Funding | 9,341(2) | 8,830(2) | 8,660 | 8,546 |
| % cash change in total Government funding | -4% | -5% | -2% | -1% |
| (1)How this funding is paid to the police may change as a result of potential changes to the retention of business rates. (2)This includes a small amount of funding that will form part of a contingency fund, which is not shown in the table above. | ||||
Indicative allocations of these grants (with the exception of counter-terrorism funding) for each force in England and Wales for 2011-12 and 2012-13 are set out in table 3, and for 2013-14 and 2014-15 are set out in table 4.
Police Allocation Formula
I have taken into consideration representations made as part of the public consultation into the Police Allocation Formula. As a result, I have made three technical changes. These are the consolidation of Rule 2 grant; the inclusion of bar density data at CSP level; and the use of more up-to-date data to determine activity based costings. Details of these changes will be given to all forces with their allocations.
Specific Grants
Indicative amounts of these grants are set out in table 3.
Neighbourhood Policing Fund
The Neighbourhood Policing Fund specific grant will continue until directly elected police and crime commissioners are in place. Funding totalling £340 million in 2011-12 and £338 million in 2012-13 will be made available. Approximately 90% of the grant will be ring-fenced for PCSOs-contributing up to 75% of their salary costs. The remaining 25% will need to be match-funded by the police, councils, businesses and other organisations. This will not apply to the Metropolitan Police Authority who will have full discretion on the spending of this funding from 2011-12. From 2013-14 this fund will be consolidated into the Police Main Grant.
Counter-Terrorism
Counter-terrorism has been prioritised to ensure that the police will have the necessary resources to respond to the changing demands posed by the terrorist threat. We have allocated £567 million to support counter-terrorism policing in 2011-12.
Forces will be notified of their individual allocations in early January. For security reasons, these allocations will not be available in the public domain.
Private Finance Initiatives Grant
Specific funding will be given to cover the costs of private finance initiative projects which are currently operational and where grants are being paid in 2010-11, and for projects that become operational in 2011-12. The Home Office will continue to support projects that are currently in procurement.
National, International and Capital City Grant
The National, International and Capital City Grant will continue to recognise the unique additional duties performed by the Metropolitan police service. In 2011-12 the funding will be £200 million. It will be reduced in subsequent years on the same basis as the Police Main Grant.
Council Tax Freeze
Funding was made available in the police spending review settlement to help police authorities deliver a council tax freeze in 2011-12. Should every authority participate in the freeze, it is estimated that they will receive a total of around £75 million in each of the next four years to compensate for income that they would otherwise have raised from council tax. Funding for this was included in the police settlement, and has been set aside accordingly.
Other Funding
Police Capital
I am today also setting out capital allocations for forces over the next four years. Police capital will be at 55% of its current level by 2014-15. In 2011-12 more pressing capital priorities within the Home Office mean that it will be reduced to 40% of its level this year, however I have ensured that the police service will be compensated through an increase in capital funding in the following financial year.
I intend to allocate the majority of this funding directly to police authorities/PCCs, who will all receive the same % change in funding, as set out in table 5. I will also continue to support the National Police Air Service and maintain a capital contingency.
| Table 2: Division of police capital between funding streams | ||||
| 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 | |
| £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Capital Grant | 85 | 125 | 115 | 115 |
| National Police Air Service | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Special Grant Capital | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 90 | 130 | 120 | 120 |
Olympic Safety and Security
Safety and security for the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics is a priority for this Government. Safety and security planning is well advanced and on schedule.
In accordance with the commitment made by the then Minister for the Olympics in 2007, the Government will make up to £600 million available, if required, for the Olympic safety and security programme. Since 2007 the Home Office has identified significant financial savings and the Government believe that it will be possible to continue to make further savings without creating additional risk. At this stage, with almost two years before the games begin, we estimate that it should be possible to deliver the core cross-Government safety and security programme for about £475 million.
Beyond the £134 million which will have been spent by the Home Office by the end of the current financial year, the Home Office will be providing £107 million in 2011-12 and £192 million in 2012-13, primarily for the police service, to meet the Olympic safety and security costs. This funding is in addition to the core police funding detailed above and the contributions being made by other Government Departments. Home Office funding includes a very substantial financial provision for contingencies.
We assess this funding will be sufficient to meet the anticipated cost of delivering the capability and capacity that will be required to ensure a safe and secure Olympics and Paralympics. A further Olympic contingency of around £500 million is available for cross-programme issues, including a material change in circumstances relating to Olympic safety and security.
Venue security is a shared responsibility of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG), as the event organiser, and the Government, as the guarantor of security for the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and a further investment of about £280 million will also be made available for the specific purpose of supporting the (LOCOG) in their responsibilities to secure Olympic venues before and throughout the games.
The Olympic safety and security operation will depend heavily on the existing substantial investment which the Government have made in counter-terrorism policing and infrastructure. We are committed to providing £567 million in 2011-12 and £564 million in 2012-13 for counter-terrorism policing capabilities: much of this capacity will be devoted to the Olympics in 2012.
| Table 3: Provisional and Indicative revenue allocations for English and Welsh Police Authorities for 2011-12 and 2012-13 | ||||||||||||||
| Police Authority | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | ||||||||||||
| HO Core | NPF | Welsh Top up | WAG | CLG | HO Core | NPF | Welsh Top up | WAG | CLG | |||||
| £m | £m | |||||||||||||
| Avon and Somerset | 120.9 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 64.3 | 112.7 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.2 | ||||
| Bedfordshire | 43.9 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.3 | 40.8 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.4 | ||||
| Cambridgeshire | 53.7 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.7 | 50.0 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.8 | ||||
| Cheshire | 69.5 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 53.2 | 64.3 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.2 | ||||
| City of London | 31.6 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.9 | 30.2 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.3 | ||||
| Cleveland | 51.4 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 46.3 | 47.5 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 43.6 | ||||
| Cumbria | 33.1 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36.1 | 30.5 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 34.0 | ||||
| Derbyshire | 70.2 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 45.8 | 65.0 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 43.2 | ||||
| Devon and Cornwall | 118.9 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 72.3 | 110.5 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67.9 | ||||
| Dorset | 45.9 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.0 | 42.4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | ||||
| Durham | 47.8 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 44.3 | 3,3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41,7 | ||||
| Dyfed-Powys | 34.3 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 17.1 | 0.0 | 32.1 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 15,7 | 0.0 | ||||
| Essex | 117.6 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6507 | 109.5 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 61.5 | ||||
| Gloucestershire | 39.1 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.4 | 36.2 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.1 | ||||
| Greater London Authority | 1,127.7 | 101.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 897.8 | 1,051.6 | 101.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 838.2 | ||||
| Greater Manchester | 248.5 | 17.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 220.0 | 230.2 | 17.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 206.9 | ||||
| Gwent | 48.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 35.1 | 0.0 | 44.7 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 33.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Hampshire | 138.0 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 74.3 | 128.1 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 69.9 | ||||
| Hertfordshire | 79.5 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.5 | 73.9 | 5,3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.8 | ||||
| Humberside | 74.8 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.5 | 69.5 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52.1 | ||||
| Kent | 117.9 | 8.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 81.6 | 109.5 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 76.6 | ||||
| Lancashire | 114.3 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92.7 | 105.7 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 87.5 | ||||
| Leicestershire | 72.4 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 48.0 | 67.3 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 45.0 | ||||
| Lincolnshire | 42.9 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24.6 | 39.8 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.1 | ||||
| Merseyside | 137.8 | 9.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 133.5 | 127.0 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 126.1 | ||||
| Norfolk | 57.7 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.1 | 53.7 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 31.0 | ||||
| North Wales | 49.6 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 46.2 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 24.8 | 0.0 | ||||
| North Yorkshire | 47.2 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 31.7 | 43.9 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 29.8 | ||||
| Northamptonshire | 48.6 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 28.8 | 45.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.0 | ||||
| Northumbria | 124.3 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 126.7 | 115.0 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 119.2 | ||||
| Nottinghamshire | 86.8 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 57.0 | 80.7 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 53.5 | ||||
| South Wales | 100.6 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 81.9 | 0.0 | 92.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 77.6 | 0.0 | ||||
| South Yorkshire | 110.8 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.5 | 102.7 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 88.8 | ||||
| Staffordshire | 74.2 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 48.9 | 68.6 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 46.2 | ||||
| Suffolk | 45.9 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.3 | 42.8 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.5 | ||||
| Surrey | 70.0 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35.3 | 65.0 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.2 | ||||
| Sussex | 109.0 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 65.9 | 101,1 | 7.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 62.0 | ||||
| Thames Valley | 158.2 | 9.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89.4 | 147.0 | 9.1 | 0,0 | 0.0 | 84.0 | ||||
| Warwickshire | 35,2 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 20.1 | 32.7 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 18.9 | ||||
| West Mercia | 74.1 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 52.1 | 68.6 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 49.1 | ||||
| West Midlands | 272.9 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 224.9 | 252.9 | 15.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 211.5 | ||||
| West Yorkshire | 192.7 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 150.9 | 179.3 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 141.2 | ||||
| Wiltshire | 41.6 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.3 | 38.7 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 23.8 | ||||
| Total England and Wales | 4,779.1 | 340.0 | 13.0 | 161.0 | 3,345.0 | 4,440.1 | 338.0 | 12.8 | 151.0 | 3,138.0 | ||||
| Table 4: Provisional and Indicative revenue allocations for English and Welsh Police Authorities for 2013-14 and 2014-15 | ||
| Police Authority | 2013-14 | 2014-15 |
| HO(1) | HO(1) | |
| £ m | £ m | |
| Avon & Somerset | 120.1 | 118.3 |
| Bedfordshire | 43.4 | 42.7 |
| Cambridgeshire | 53.3 | 52.4 |
| Cheshire | 68.0 | 66.5 |
| City of London | 32.9 | 33.0 |
| Cleveland | 50.2 | 49.1 |
| Cumbria | 32.3 | 31.5 |
| Derbyshire | 69.0 | 67.6 |
| Devon & Cornwall | 117.4 | 115.2 |
| Dorset | 44.9 | 43.9 |
| Durham | 46.9 | 45.9 |
| Dyfed-Powys | 31.1 | 30.5 |
| Essex | 116.7 | 114.9 |
| Gloucestershire | 38.4 | 37.7 |
| Greater London Authority | 1,102.3 | 1,084.1 |
| Greater Manchester | 244.1 | 239.0 |
| Gwent | 46.0 | 44.9 |
| Hampshire | 136.1 | 133.6 |
| Hertfordshire | 78.5 | 77.1 |
| Humberside | 73.8 | 72.4 |
| Kent | 116.4 | 114.2 |
| Lancashire | 111.8 | 109.2 |
| Leicestershire | 71.6 | 70.3 |
| Lincolnshire | 42.3 | 41.5 |
| Merseyside | 133.9 | 130.5 |
| Norfolk | 57.2 | 56.2 |
| North Wales | 44.7 | 43.7 |
| North Yorkshire | 46.6 | 45.7 |
| Northamptonshire | 48.2 | 47.5 |
| Northumbria | 121.7 | 119.0 |
| Nottinghamshire | 85.7 | 84.2 |
| South Wales | 106.9 | 105.0 |
| South Yorkshire | 109.0 | 106.9 |
| Staffordshire | 72.6 | 71.0 |
| Suffolk | 45.6 | 44.9 |
| Surrey | 69.1 | 67.8 |
| Sussex | 107.4 | 105.3 |
| Thames Valley | 156.2 | 153.4 |
| Warwickshire | 34.7 | 34.1 |
| West Mercia | 72.6 | 71.0 |
| West Midlands | 268.1 | 262.6 |
| West Yorkshire | 190.9 | 187.8 |
| Wiltshire | 41.1 | 40.4 |
| Total England and Wales | 4,699.7 | 4,612.3 |
| (1)From 2013-14, the Neighbourhood Policing Fund will be rolled into the Police Main Grant. | ||
| Table 5: Provisional capital allocations for England and Wales | ||||
| Capital Grant | ||||
| Force | 2011-12 | 2012-13 | 2013-14 | 2014-15 |
| £m | £m | £m | £m | |
| Avon & Somerset | 1.9 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Bedfordshire | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Cambridgeshire | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Cheshire | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| City of London | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Cleveland | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Cumbria | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Derbyshire | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Devon and Cornwall | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Dorset | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Durham | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Dyfed-Powys | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Essex | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Gloucestershire | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Greater Manchester | 4.3 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Gwent | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Hampshire | 2.1 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| Hertfordshire | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Humberside | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Kent | 2.0 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Lancashire | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Leicestershire | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Lincolnshire | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Merseyside | 2.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| Metropolitan | 22.5 | 33.1 | 30.5 | 30.5 |
| Norfolk | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| North Wales | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| North Yorkshire | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Northamptonshire | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Northumbria | 2.3 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Nottinghamshire | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| South Wales | 1.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| South Yorkshire | 2.0 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Staffordshire | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Suffolk | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Surrey | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Sussex | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Thames Valley | 2.7 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Warwickshire | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| West Mercia | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| West Midlands | 4.6 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| West Yorkshire | 3.3 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Wiltshire | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Total | 85.0 | 125.0 | 115.0 | 115.0 |
This phrase is often used in written answers to indicate that a minister has deposited some relevant information in the House of Commons Library. Typical content includes research reports, letters, and tables of data not published elsewhere.
A list of such depositions can be found at http://deposits.parliament.uk/ along with some of the documents. The Library is not open to the public, but copies of documents can be requested if they are not on that website. For more information, see the House of Commons factsheet: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/P15.pdf
Secretary of State was originally the title given to the two officials who conducted the Royal Correspondence under Elizabeth I. Now it is the title held by some of the more important Government Ministers, for example the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
Ministers make up the Government and almost all are members of the House of Lords or the House of Commons. There are three main types of Minister. Departmental Ministers are in charge of Government Departments. The Government is divided into different Departments which have responsibilities for different areas. For example the Treasury is in charge of Government spending. Departmental Ministers in the Cabinet are generally called 'Secretary of State' but some have special titles such as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ministers of State and Junior Ministers assist the ministers in charge of the department. They normally have responsibility for a particular area within the department and are sometimes given a title that reflects this - for example Minister of Transport.
The term "majority" is used in two ways in Parliament. Firstly a Government cannot operate effectively unless it can command a majority in the House of Commons - a majority means winning more than 50% of the votes in a division. Should a Government fail to hold the confidence of the House, it has to hold a General Election. Secondly the term can also be used in an election, where it refers to the margin which the candidate with the most votes has over the candidate coming second. To win a seat a candidate need only have a majority of 1.
The House of Commons votes by dividing. Those voting Aye (yes) to any proposition walk through the division lobby to the right of the Speaker and those voting no through the lobby to the left. In each of the lobbies there are desks occupied by Clerks who tick Members' names off division lists as they pass through. Then at the exit doors the Members are counted by two Members acting as tellers. The Speaker calls for a vote by announcing "Clear the Lobbies". In the House of Lords "Clear the Bar" is called. Division Bells ring throughout the building and the police direct all Strangers to leave the vicinity of the Members’ Lobby. They also walk through the public rooms of the House shouting "division". MPs have eight minutes to get to the Division Lobby before the doors are closed. Members make their way to the Chamber, where Whips are on hand to remind the uncertain which way, if any, their party is voting. Meanwhile the Clerks who will take the names of those voting have taken their place at the high tables with the alphabetical lists of MPs' names on which ticks are made to record the vote. When the tellers are ready the counting process begins - the recording of names by the Clerk and the counting of heads by the tellers. When both lobbies have been counted and the figures entered on a card this is given to the Speaker who reads the figures and announces "So the Ayes [or Noes] have it". In the House of Lords the process is the same except that the Lobbies are called the Contents Lobby and the Not Contents Lobby. Unlike many other legislatures, the House of Commons and the House of Lords have not adopted a mechanical or electronic means of voting. This was considered in 1998 but rejected. Divisions rarely take less than ten minutes and those where most Members are voting usually take about fifteen. Further information can be obtained from factsheet P9 at the UK Parliament site.