Human Rights in Hong Kong — [Ms Nusrat Ghani in the Chair]

Part of the debate – in Westminster Hall at 3:57 pm on 9 June 2021.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Tom Randall Tom Randall Conservative, Gedling 3:57, 9 June 2021

I am grateful to all the hon. and right hon. Members who have spoken this afternoon. When I was preparing for this debate, I reread the Hansard debate on the joint declaration in December 1984. I was struck by the fact that although there were some concerns about immigration status, there was unanimity across the House that, at the time, that was the best deal that could have been obtained for Hong Kong.

As Alyn Smith and Stephen Kinnock have identified, there has been a similar unanimity today across the Chamber on this issue. As Jim Shannon observed, many other human rights abuses have been committed by China in the region. However, as my right hon. Friend Sir Iain Duncan Smith said, this is the issue of the moment. As my hon. Friend Andrew Rosindell said, today we are discussing the decline of the most international of Asian cities.

The speeches we have heard today have illustrated the breadth of China’s actions in Hong Kong—brazen actions, in the words of my hon. Friend Alexander Stafford. We have heard about the manipulation of election rules from the hon. Members for Lewisham East (Janet Daby) and for Vauxhall (Florence Eshalomi).

John McDonnell has spoken passionately about his comrades in the trade union movement who have been affected, and Ian Paisley has spoken about how even basic things like professing one’s faith have been hindered by the actions taken by the Chinese Government.

Mr Carmichael and John Nicolson spoke about media clampdowns. At one of the most interesting and distressing meetings that I attended while involved in this subject I listened to Hong Kong journalists who had to be identified as witnesses 1, 2 and 3 because of fear of persecution. They underlined well the issues that they faced.

As Wera Hobhouse observed, democracies have to put on a united front. I am grateful to the Minister for his statement and what he said, and we would be encouraged if this matter were raised at the G7 this week. It is a matter that needs to be raised, and I am grateful for the clarification.

I will conclude by quoting from the six-monthly report on Hong Kong that is produced by the Foreign Office. The latest one said:

“It is not too late for the authorities to reach out and start to heal divisions, however complicated and difficult that might be.”

Question put and agreed to.

Resolved,

That this House
has considered human rights in Hong Kong.

Sitting suspended.