Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

NHS Services

– Scottish Parliament written question – answered on 31st January 2011.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Rhona Brankin Rhona Brankin Labour

Question S3W-39001

To ask the Scottish Executive whether there is a statutory requirement for NHS Lothian to hold a consultation regarding its proposal to cease funding homeopathy services and, if so, what this requirement is.

Photo of Nicola Sturgeon Nicola Sturgeon Scottish National Party

The 2004 NHS Reform Act introduced a statutory duty on NHS boards to encourage public engagement in both the planning and development of local services and/or decisions made by the NHS board that would significantly affect the operation of those services. The guidance to the NHS in Scotland on the appropriate level of public and stakeholder engagement for proposed service change is contained in CEL 4 (2010): Informing, Engaging and Consulting People in Developing Health and Community Care Services which can be accessed at: http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/mels/CEL2010_04.pdf .

This guidance is clear that any NHS proposals which are considered to be major must be subject to a period of formal, public consultation and, ultimately, ministerial approval.

NHS Lothian has yet to conclude consideration of its proposals for the future of local homeopathic services. I would expect the board to continue to fully engage with all local stakeholders as it further develops its plans. I am aware that Midlothian Community Health Partnership is already making arrangements to undertake a period of public consultation and I would encourage the member to engage with that consultation. As noted above, should the board’s final proposals be considered major service change, they would have to be subject to formal public consultation and ministerial approval.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes1 person thinks so

No1 person thinks not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.