Environment and Rural Affairs Department

– Scottish Parliament written question – answered at on 29 September 2004.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Richard Lochhead Richard Lochhead Scottish National Party

Question S2W-10723

To ask the Scottish Executive what the budget for its Environment and Rural Affairs Department was in each of the last five years, broken down by issue and detailing year on year percentage increases and decreases.

Photo of Andy Kerr Andy Kerr Labour

The period 1999-2000 to 2003-04 covers the transition between cash and resource budgeting and accounting which makes it difficult to compare expenditure data on a like for like basis. However, by excluding non-cash items such as cost of capital and capital depreciation, it is possible to present figures in a comparable way so as to demonstrate trends in expenditure.

To allow such a comparison, it is necessary also to exclude any exceptional items of spending. The Table below sets out details of spending by the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department on this basis and notes the year on year percentage changes for each of the Department’s Level 2 groups of spending.

£ Million

Outturn

Outturn

Outturn

Outturn

Plans

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

Cap Market Support

335

341

(+2%)

330

(-3%)

353

(+7%)

397

(+13%)

Rural Development

87

80

(-8%)

106

(+32%)

120

(+13%)

141

(+18%)

Agricultural, Biological Science and Others

83

84 (+2%)

88

(+5%)

93 (+5%)

119

(+28%)

Fisheries

33

32

(-4%)

35

(+11%)

41

(+15%)

48

(+17%)

Natural Heritage

39

41

(+6%)

53 (+28%)

55 (+4%)

65

(+18%)

Environmental Protection

19

21

(+9%)

27

(+32%)

44 (+62%)

86

(+95%)

Research and Sustainable Action

2

2

3

(+50%)

5 (+71%)

7

(+38%)

Water Services

216

209

(-3%)

211

(+1%)

182

(-14%)

181

(-1%)

Total SEERAD

814

809

(-1%)

854

(+6%)

892

(+4%)

1,044

(+17%)

Notes:

1. Provision for CAP Market Support spending is agreed annually with the UK Treasury and is outside the Scottish Block.

2. Numbers shown for fisheries expenditure exclude the exceptional provision made for Decommissioning and Transitional Aid Schemes.

3. Figures for Natural Heritage spending in 2003-04 exclude exceptional provision for transfer of Pensions liabilities.

Does this answer the above question?

Yes1 person thinks so

No1 person thinks not

Would you like to ask a question like this yourself? Use our Freedom of Information site.