Although I supported Alex Cole-Hamilton at stage 2, this is an example of where we need to consider what we have passed. It comes down to the words that are in the bill at the moment, which I will read out. The section states:
“Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), where an application is made to a planning authority for planning permission for development on land designated as green belt land, a planning authority may not grant planning permission—
(a) if the applicant has not included in the application for planning permission a statement setting out—
(i) why the development cannot be achieved on land the planning authority consider brownfield land”.
So, let us think about that extension—how will that be managed? The section also requires the statement to set out
“(ii) the brownfield land that was considered and why it was not considered suitable to the development”.
The person therefore has to show that they considered a piece of brownfield land. How on earth is that achievable in the case of a small-scale extension or a conservatory?