Part of the debate – in the Scottish Parliament at on 24 April 2013.
Given what the member has just said and the Government’s amendment, which
“notes the Scottish Court Service’s belief that the proposals will support a future court structure fit for the 21st century”,
why should any member accept the arguments that his party is putting forward about budgetary constraints as anything other than a complete red herring that is designed to divert attention from the real impact of the proposals?