Question Time — scottish executive – in the Scottish Parliament at 2:30 pm on 5 October 2000.
To ask the Scottish Executive what effect the introduction of the aggregates tax will have on the cost of the upgrading of the A77. (S1O-2362)
I am sorry. I missed that question.
The question asked was number 8.
It deals with the M77—I see that we have moved on. My apologies to Mr Scott.
The effect that the aggregates tax will have on the cost of the proposed extension of the M77 between Fenwick and Malletsheugh is unknown. It will depend on the extent to which the contractor adopts the use of recycled aggregates.
Does the minister agree that the imposition of the aggregates tax is likely to cost jobs in Ayrshire and in the rest of Scotland? How many jobs does she estimate will be lost?
I do not agree. The construction of the road is likely to create local employment.
Our view is that the aggregates tax will be taken on board when contractors bid for contracts. The issue of the A77 will be taken forward in the competitive tendering process, when contractors evaluate the best methods of constructing the road.
Tayside Contracts supplies approximately 60,000 tonnes of quarried material for road maintenance purposes. The tax will result in an additional cost of £96,000 to Perth and Kinross Council, Angus Council and Dundee City Council. Will the minister approach the chancellor—
Order. We are talking about the A77.
The issue is about aggregates tax.
I know, but the question is about the A77.
Oh, come on. That is outrageous.
Order. The aggregates tax is a reserved matter. The question is about the effect of the tax on the A77.