Results 121–140 of 3717 for (in the 'Commons debates' OR in the 'Westminster Hall debates' OR in the 'Lords debates' OR in the 'Northern Ireland Assembly debates') speaker:Matthew Hancock

Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [ Lords] (15 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: I am trying to follow the hon. Member's argument, but does not the concept of a judicial implementation of asset-freezing contradict the fact that this is a global system? Whether it is done through the EU or the UN, the designation is done at that global level and then executed in the UK. The decision is not made in the UK, so while the right of appeal is important, it is crucial that the...

Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [ Lords] (15 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: I understand the figure of just under £290,000 to be the amount that is currently frozen, rather than the amount that has been frozen over time. Past figures have been much higher.

Oral Answers to Questions — Prime Minister: Finance Ministers' Meeting (Ireland) (17 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Would it not be a grave error if we took from this episode the lesson that we should weaken our resolve to deal with our debts and keep our house in order?

Business, Innovation and Skills: Regional Growth Fund (18 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: In the past, regional development funds have ignored areas of deprivation in some parts of the country-for instance, those in West Suffolk-because they are surrounded by areas of comparative wealth. Will the Minister confirm that any area of the country can apply for funding under the new regional growth fund, no matter how small the area of comparative deprivation might be?

Business, Innovation and Skills: Topical Questions (18 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Students who complete degrees are rightly lauded as graduates at elaborate ceremonies that are all too often unlike those for people who learn valuable crafts. Does the Minister for Further Education, Skills and Lifelong Learning agree that we must do more to recognise the value and status of those who complete apprenticeships?

Oral Answers to Questions — Work and Pensions: Financial Assistance (Ireland) (22 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Is not the lesson from what is happening in Ireland clear: that countries need to get their own houses in order? Would it not be utter folly for us to take as the lesson that we should divert from the path of getting our house in order here in the UK?

Internet Pornography (23 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: I commend my hon. Friend the Member for Devizes (Claire Perry) on initiating such an important debate so early in the evening. I am glad that the Minister has enunciated the principle that ISPs are not merely a pipe through which information flows, but he has not taken the opportunity to point out that they could do more. Will he take that opportunity now?

Oral Answers to Questions — House of Commons Commission: Autumn Forecast (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Will the Chancellor give us his assessment of what would happen if we ignored the advice of the IMF, the OECD and the EU, and moved from the path of putting our own house in order?

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Does my hon. Friend think that it is inconsistent to argue both that the banks should lend more to small businesses and that the improvement in capital ratios should be speeded up, as we have heard from some hon. Members?

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: I want to speak briefly at the end of what has been a very interesting and informative debate, which I commend the Backbench Business Committee on securing. I welcome some of the measures that the Government have already taken, so in the light of this debate, I hope that the motion, which states that the Government have taken no action, will not be pressed to a vote. Many Members have...

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: I thank the right hon. Gentleman for that intervention, because it brings me precisely to the final thing that the Government have already proposed, and which I think is central to preventing a recurrence of the financial crash: the decision to move the powers for prudential regulation to the Bank of England and to strengthen those powers. Having quickly welcomed the action already taken, I...

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: They were not used, and that is the problem. A massive, heavy and expanding rulebook distracted the attention of regulators away from the big picture. My third point about why discretion rather than rules is the best way for the future concerns the importance of the macro-economy, because we cannot separate monetary policy from banking policy. The size of banks' balance sheets is crucial to...

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: That is a valid and important point. Central to that point is the judgment of people who look forward and have a broad view, looking after the health not only of the banking system, but of the macro-economy, while also having the ability to change the way they regulate according to changes in the economy, so as to take into account new developments, which is critical. Far from being the...

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: In my experience it is always better to be anything than a clunking fist. I will end by saying this. We do not know what the future holds. We know that regulation is not perfect. It is therefore far better to have one person and an institution in charge of the regulatory structure who can exercise judgment to the best of their ability than it is to try to write a rulebook for a perfect system...

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: rose -

Backbench Business — [11th allotted day]: Banking Reform (29 Nov 2010)

Matthew Hancock: The hon. Gentleman is making an argument for rejecting the Walker review. I was not in the House during the last Parliament. Could he just tell us who commissioned the Walker review?

Daylight Saving Bill (3 Dec 2010)

Matthew Hancock: In gathering evidence on the issue, will my hon. Friend ensure that the evidence of those who play and watch sport is taken into account? Sport continuing later can help to deal with antisocial behaviour, so today, with our cricketers in Australia, will she ensure that the evidence recognises how frustrating it is to millions of cricket fans throughout the country when bad light stops play?

Daylight Saving Bill (3 Dec 2010)

Matthew Hancock: Given that the hon. Gentleman has made a strong argument for the need to ask more questions and receive more answers, for example, on the construction industry, why will he not vote in favour of the Bill?

Business of the House (9 Dec 2010)

Matthew Hancock: May we have a debate on the future of the horse racing levy, which, as my right hon. Friend well knows, is the mechanism by which a contribution is made to the racing industry by the gambling industry and those who place bets? The levy is in desperate need of modernisation, and I think that many hon. Members would have an interest in such a debate.

Consolidated Fund Bill: Higher Education Fees (9 Dec 2010)

Matthew Hancock: The right hon. Gentleman will not accept comparisons between the existing scheme and the Government's proposals, but will he accept the analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies showing that the proposed system is more progressive than both the current scheme and the measures put forward in the Browne review?


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.