Results 61–80 of 1000 for (in the 'Commons debates' OR in the 'Westminster Hall debates' OR in the 'Lords debates' OR in the 'Northern Ireland Assembly debates') speaker:Baroness Sharp of Guildford

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: The Minister is right in remarking that the debate on whether Clause 59 should stand part of the Bill should really have taken place on the first group of amendments that I moved this evening. In that sense, I accept that we have already discussed the issues. As I mentioned before, we may well return to them on Report. For the moment, I withdraw my opposition to the Question that the clause...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I rise to endorse the statements made by the noble Baroness, Lady Blatch, and to thank the Minister for the clarification given in the draft clauses about the transition arrangements. I echo the concerns expressed about the position of people in the TECs. There is real concern among those employed by TECs as to where they will be. I urge the Minister to speed as much as possible the issuing...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: moved Amendment No. 202A: Page 37, line 2, at end insert ("provided that subsection (2) shall not apply to any course intended to promote the personal, social, moral or physical development of an individual").

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: In moving Amendment No. 202A, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 202B. These amendments are essentially probing amendments. As it stands, Clause 85, supplemented by Clauses 87 and 88, would seem to preclude the funding body--defined either as the learning and skills council, the LEA or any other body designated by the Secretary of State--from funding any course of education or training for a...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I am grateful to the Minister for her reassurances on these issues. In the light of her remarks, and now that they are on the record, I am glad to withdraw the amendment.

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: At this time of night I hesitate to rise. However, I must agree that, once again, we have an excessive use of words here, that it is gobbledegook and that, quite frankly, if Clause 94(5)(a) means what it says--that it shall be specified, "by the Secretary of State in a way he thinks fit"-- it covers subsection (5)(b) and we can do away with that subsection completely.

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: moved Amendment No. 207: Page 43, line 16, at end insert-- ("( ) Before an order is made under subsection (3) above, the Council must publish a report detailing the effect of the establishment of the proposed institution on education and training provision in the area of the local council in which it is located, and in any adjacent areas which may be affected."").

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that should an LEA or other body make use of the powers granted to it under Clause 96(3) to open a new 16 to 19 institution in an area, that there should be wide consultation and consideration of the knock-on effect of its establishment on other educational facilities in that area. In effect, the amendment is asking for an area educational impact...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (15 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I am grateful to the Minister. I confess that I had read this clause as giving provision to establish a new sixth form centre of some sort. From what he says it clearly does not. Given the time of morning, perhaps the sensible course would be for us to read and study what he has said, consider the matter again and possibly bring the amendment back at Report stage. In the meantime, I beg leave...

The Rowntree Report (16 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: My Lords, I should like to join with other noble Lords in thanking my noble friend Lord Russell for initiating this very important debate. As my title implies, I come from Guildford, which is hardly the most deprived area of this country. However, even in Guildford there are pockets of deprivation. I am a governor of a small primary school located on one of Guildford's council estates. It is...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: moved Amendment No. 210E: Page 70, line 26, at end insert-- ("(3) Sub-paragraph (2)(b) above shall not apply where a report is made within six months of the previous report.").

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: In moving Amendment No. 210E, I should like to speak at the same time to Amendment No. 210M. We welcome the Minister's assurance that the proposals put forward for Schedule 7 will not target small sixth forms, in particular those in rural areas. We accept that high standards are necessary and that it is usual for Ofsted to make such inspections. However, we have reservations about the details...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I thank the Minister for her reply and for putting on the record her assurances in relation to the first amendment in the group. As regards the second amendment, I am somewhat less happy. As the noble Baroness, Lady Blatch, has already said, retrospective legislation is not satisfactory. We shall not press the amendment today, but we may wish to return to this matter on Report.

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: moved Amendment No. 210N: Page 72, line 16, leave out ("such") and insert ("the governing body and head teacher of the school concerned and such other").

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: In moving Amendment No. 210N, I should like to speak at the same time to Amendments Nos. 210P to 210V. Amendment No. 210N is the first of a further set of amendments relating to the details of Schedule 7, in particular to Part II of the schedule relating to proposals for the closure of sixth forms. Amendments Nos. 210N and 210P relate to England and require that the learning and skills...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I thank the Minister for his full reply to these amendments. I am much heartened by the degree to which he has given assurances that the detailed guidance from the department, which will be incorporated in a circular similar to Circular 9/99, which relates to the School Standards and Framework Bill, will apply in a similar way in this case. These concerns have been raised by the National...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: moved Amendment No. 210W: Page 74, line 44, after ("issued") insert ("or assurances given").

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: In moving Amendment No. 210W, I wish to speak also to Amendments Nos. 210X and 212A. I believe that I am right in saying that the Minister has already replied to Amendment No. 210W, which relates to the issue of publications. I should like to place on record that this amendment would require a school organisation committee in England to have regard to assurances given by the Secretary of...

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I believed that the Minister had already mentioned Amendment No. 210W. Again, this amendment concerns the issue of consultation. From these Benches, we have never been too happy with school organisation committees, but we accept that they now exist. However, it is extremely important that they take account of the assurances given by the Secretary of State on the future of school sixth forms....

Learning and Skills Bill [H.L.] (17 Feb 2000)

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: I thank the Minister for his full reply to this series of amendments and for his assurances on Amendment No. 210W. I do not think that we were wishing to fetter the power of the school organisation committees in any sense. It is extremely helpful to have on the record the very full explanation that the noble Lord has given. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.