Results 61–80 of 148 for speaker:Lord Armstrong of Ilminster

Death of a Member: Baroness Thatcher — Tributes (10 Apr 2013)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: Lady Thatcher had greatly disliked his predecessor and Mitterrand was said to be a socialist, but the meetings went rather well. Despite the interpretation, they went smoothly and there were good speeches by both parties at a dinner. When the President finally came to leave the next afternoon, I went with the Prime Minister to see him off at the front door of No. 10 Downing Street. As we...

Death of a Member: Baroness Thatcher — Tributes (10 Apr 2013)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: Looking back, I recognised that the President had been-how shall I put it?-flattering her femininity throughout the meeting, and that she had recognised that and enjoyed every minute of it. More than once during the time that I was with her, she told me that her role as Prime Minister was to be the guardian of the strategy. She had a clear vision of what that strategy should be and of the...

Accountability of Civil Servants: Constitution Committee Report: Motion to Take Note ( 7 Feb 2013)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I add my voice to those which have congratulated and expressed thanks to the noble Baroness, Lady Jay, and to the Constitution Committee for their measured, balanced and authoritative report which brings the threads together and presents us with some very sensible and well considered conclusions. The committee has done the state some service in robustly and, in my view, correctly...

Financial Services Bill — Report (1st Day) ( 6 Nov 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, if I may take the semantic point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Peston, if the word "oversight" is capable of being misinterpreted why not use "supervisory", which is just the Latin version and means exactly the same without the possible misunderstanding?

Queen's Speech — Debate (3rd Day) (14 May 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I am not proposing in this debate to rehearse yet again my proposals for the reform of the composition of this House. On two previous occasions in this Chamber I have set out ideas for the composition of a reformed House. Those ideas were also set out in a memorandum of evidence which the right honourable Frank Field MP and I submitted to the Richard committee, the Joint Committee,...

Queen's Speech — Debate (3rd Day) (14 May 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: I do not know that it would differ in essentials but, as other noble Lords have pointed out, since the royal commission chaired by the noble Lord, Lord Wakeham, history and life have moved on. There is a new set of circumstances and new considerations to be taken into account. The expert team would be responsible for producing papers analysing the issues and making recommendations for...

Health Transition Risk Register — Statement (10 May 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Walton. As I understand it, the Government's position on the disclosure of risk registers is a matter of principle. It is clearly crucial that an assessment of risk or a risk register should be comprehensive and candid if it is to be of any use. If it is not comprehensive and candid, and if those who compile it are prevented or discouraged from making...

News Corporation: Conduct of Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport — Statement (30 Apr 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, as the Leader of the Opposition has referred to what I said about this matter, I should like to clarify that if I may, and ask the Leader of the House whether he agrees with it. I have said that the Prime Minister is responsible for decisions about ministerial conduct and for deciding whether a Minister has or has not breached the code. If he has, or thinks he has, sufficient...

Health and Social Care Bill: Third Reading (19 Mar 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, and my noble friend Lord Wilson of Dinton in advising the House not to support the Motion. I do not want to go into any more detail on the risk registers. They need to be comprehensive and candid; if there is a risk of publishing them, the compilers will be less likely to make them as comprehensive and candid as they need to be in order to be...

Protection of Freedoms Bill — Report (2nd Day) (Continued) ( 6 Feb 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I would like to express my gratitude to the noble Lord for taking the time to talk about this matter at a meeting last week. That was useful-I hope to both of us. I say to the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, that the time constraint I had in mind is that which would arise if the need to extend a period of detention became clear after somebody had already been in detention for 10 days...

Protection of Freedoms Bill — Report (2nd Day) (Continued) ( 6 Feb 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I beg to move the amendment standing in my name and in the names of the noble Baroness, Lady Royall of Blaisdon, the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, and the noble Baroness, Lady Liddell of Coatdyke. Clause 57 establishes clearly the principle that a terrorist suspect should not be detained without being charged for longer than 14 days. Over the years, there has been much debate about how...

Freedom of Information Act 2000 — Question for Short Debate (17 Jan 2012)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I am glad to be contributing to this short debate initiated by my noble friend and former adversary Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield. I say "former adversary", because when he was the Whitehall correspondent of the Times and I was the Principal Private Secretary at 10 Downing Street, I was required by my political masters to see that Whitehall did all it could to frustrate his knavish...

Transport: Fuel Prices — Question (24 Nov 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, while the noble Baroness is looking at the possibility of displaying prices of fuel stations further down the motorway, will she also look at the possibility of allowing those who provide the fuel at motorway services to say on the notices outside the motorway station who they are? You can say where the coffee comes from, and who is providing that and other services, but you do not...

Protection of Freedoms Bill: Second Reading ( 8 Nov 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, this is a veritable bran-tub of a Bill, as is apparent from the Long Title. It might be more charitably described as a Christmas pie full of plums. I propose, like little Jack Horner, to put in my thumb and pull out a plum-like my noble friend Lady O'Neill, only one plum for consideration at this stage. That plum is Part 4, which deals with counterterrorism powers. There is clearly...

Fixed-term Parliaments Bill — Commons Amendment (14 Sep 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for quoting my words from a different debate and I do not resile from a single word of that. None the less, I join my noble friends Lord Butler and Lord Pannick in hoping that the House will insist on this amendment, which has now already been passed twice by this House, by a larger majority the second time than the first. I will be a little kinder to...

Fixed-term Parliaments Bill — Consideration of Commons Reason (18 Jul 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: As one who put his name to the amendment on Report, I rise briefly to add to the comments of my noble friend Lord Butler of Brockwell and others. I do not need to go through the defects of and objections to the Bill again. For all the reasons given in earlier stages, and again by my noble friend Lord Butler now, I share his view that the Bill is neither necessary, nor desirable, nor...

Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Report (5th Day)(Continued) (14 Jul 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I sympathise with the objectives and purposes of the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, in tabling these amendments and with those who have spoken in favour of it. There are two points on the practicability of the scheme that I would like to query, which both relate to this Parliament Square committee. First, would the authorities of the Palace of Westminster be represented on it? That is...

European Union Bill: Commons Amendments and Reasons (13 Jul 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I fear that some of the speakers in this debate are guilty of a terminological inexactitude. If we wait here for another hour or two, as seems quite likely, we shall find that the sun sets and there is nothing we can do about it. That was the effect of Amendment 15-the sun was going to set when there was a general election and there was nothing we could do about it. Amendment D1 is...

House of Lords: Reform — Motion to Take Note (2nd Day) (22 Jun 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I was gratified and flattered to hear the noble Lord the Leader of the House, speaking on the radio recently, put first among the categories of experts whose contribution to the House he would like to retain the former Cabinet Secretaries. I am tempted to say to the noble Lord, "Flattery will get you nowhere, my Lord, but please go on trying". We argue endlessly about the...

European Union Bill: Committee (7th Day) (Continued) (23 May 2011)

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster: My Lords, I intervene as one who is not learned in the law, unlike most previous speakers. I put down an amendment that Clause 18 should not stand part of the Bill. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Howe, referred to that and also put his name to the amendment. I listened to those who are learned in the law dancing on the point of a legal pin. I shall take the matter away and look at what they...


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>

Create an alert

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.