Results 41–60 of 185 for speaker:Lord Strasburger

Metropolitan Police: Live Facial Recognition - Question (16 Mar 2020)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the Metropolitan Police about the use of Live Facial Recognition deployments; whether the watchlists for such deployments are composed exclusively of serious criminals; and what is the definition of serious criminals for this purpose.

Written Answers — Home Office: Police: Biometrics (16 Mar 2020)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 17 February (HL1336), why their response is inconsistent with the press release from the Metropolitan Police following the facial recognition deployments which (1) stated that the individual arrested on suspicion of discharging a firearm was arrested "as part of the wider operation" and not "as...

Written Answers — Home Office: Police: Biometrics (16 Mar 2020)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government, what assessment they have made of the finding by the Scottish Parliament that there was "no justification" for Police Scotland to use facial recognition technology; and why police in London and South Wales continue to use live facial recognition surveillance.

Written Answers — Home Office: Police: Biometrics (17 Feb 2020)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total cost of the Metropolitan Police’s recent trial of automated facial recognition technology, including preparatory work, and encompassing equipment and manpower costs; and how many staff were required for a typical deployment during the trial, broken down by role.

Written Answers — Home Office: Police: Biometrics (17 Feb 2020)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government, during the recent Metropolitan Police trial of automated facial recognition technology, how many individuals on the system’s watchlist were correctly identified; how many alerts resulted in (1) an arrest, and (2) a subsequent conviction; and for which offences.

Facial Recognition Technology - Question (2 Oct 2019)

Lord Strasburger: My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lord Clement-Jones, and with his permission, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in his name on the Order Paper. I remind the House of my interest as chair of Big Brother Watch.

Facial Recognition Technology - Question (2 Oct 2019)

Lord Strasburger: I thank the Minister for that reply. The Government have previously confirmed that this highly intrusive technology is being deployed in a legal vacuum. Alarmingly, we have recently discovered that private companies have for years been secretly using automated facial recognition in public spaces, and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has warned that we are sleepwalking into an...

Business of the House - Motion on Standing Orders: Amendment to the Motion (4 Apr 2019)

Lord Strasburger: I wonder whether the noble Lord has completed his remarks on the amendment. If so, will he please sit down?

Business of the House - Motion on Standing Orders: Motion (4 Apr 2019)

Lord Strasburger: I think we have heard enough, have we not? I move that the Question be now put.

Business of the House - Motion on Standing Orders: Motion (4 Apr 2019)

Lord Strasburger: Yes. Ayes 239, Noes 62.

Business of the House - Motion on Standing Orders: Amendment to the Motion (4 Apr 2019)

Lord Strasburger: I remind the House that this is the Prime Minister who told the nation seven times that she was not going to call a snap election—and the eighth time, she said she was.

Brexit: Economic Forecast - Question (28 Nov 2018)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they forecast that any sectors of the United Kingdom economy will be disadvantaged by the proposed European Union Withdrawal Agreement and political declaration when compared with the alternative of the United Kingdom remaining a member of the European Union; and, if so which sectors.

Brexit: Economic Forecast - Question (28 Nov 2018)

Lord Strasburger: I thank the Minister for that Answer to my Question, if that is what he thinks it was. The Prime Minister repeatedly asserts that rejecting her deal will take us back to square one. That can mean only one thing: that we continue with our current status, which is full membership of the European Union, with all its benefits and with all our current opt-outs. Does the Minister agree with the...

Written Answers — Home Office: UK Membership of EU: Referendums (5 Nov 2018)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the time taken between the Metropolitan Police being notified by the Electoral Commission of possible breaches of electoral law by Leave.EU and their collection of relevant evidence from the Electoral Commission.

Written Answers — Home Office: UK Membership of EU: Referendums (5 Nov 2018)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that any breaking of electoral law by pro-leave campaigns during the referendum is investigated; and in what timeframe they anticipate such investigations taking place.

Brexit: Economic Forecasts - Question (24 Oct 2018)

Lord Strasburger: To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether their forecasts for the next ten years show a better outcome for the United Kingdom economy if the United Kingdom were to remain in the European Union than if it were to leave.

Brexit: Economic Forecasts - Question (24 Oct 2018)

Lord Strasburger: My Lords, as full EU members we currently enjoy the best possible trading terms with the EU 27. Any other deal must, by definition, be worse. Our Government are striving for a deal with our biggest trading partner that can only downgrade what we have now—that is worth thinking about. Does the Minister know of any other country that has deliberately degraded its trading relationship with its...

Tenant Fees Bill - Second Reading (10 Oct 2018)

Lord Strasburger: My Lords, returning to the Bill, I start by drawing the House’s attention to my declaration of interests in the register, specifically to the fact that I own 11 investment properties, either solely or jointly with my wife, and have done for something like the last 20 years. I also have a shareholding in a small letting agent in Bath. I am therefore in a position perhaps to bring a slightly...


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.