Results 141–160 of 1556 for speaker:Mr Robin Squire

Orders of the Day — Opposition Day: Standards in Education (11 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: The hon. Gentleman is talking absolute tripe. His suggestion that the creation of a grammar school, as one of 12 schools in an area, will at a stroke demolish the education provided in the other 11 is balderdash.

Orders of the Day — Opposition Day: Standards in Education (11 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: No, we do not.

Orders of the Day — Opposition Day: Standards in Education (11 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. I know that he intends to move on, but it is important to put on record the fact that, according to the latest figures that I have seen, there are fewer primary school pupils in classes of more than 30 and 35 than there were in 1979.

Prayers: Primary Schools (5 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: Having given a little time to others, I hope that the House will understand if, unusually, I do not give way to interventions—as I normally do. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Castle Point (Dr. Spink) on securing this important debate, and I am grateful to him for providing the opportunity to discuss primary education. I am sure that it was a slip of the tongue on the part of...

Prayers: Primary Schools (5 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: rose

Prayers: Primary Schools (5 Jun 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I hesitate to interrupt the hon. Gentleman's flow, but I must put on the record again that, as he knows, expenditure per pupil since 1979 has gone up by some 50 per cent. in real terms—a record of which the Labour Government prior to 1979 would have been proud.

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: There have been a number of representations on all aspects of the nursery education voucher scheme.

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I look forward to reading the account of the debate in the other place. I always listen with care to what their Lordships say. When the hon. Lady refers to Norfolk, the county of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State, she must recognise that the take-up of vouchers is now 96 per cent. which suggests that her allegations about bureaucracy are overstated. We are witnessing in phase 1, and...

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I am grateful to my hon. Friend, who will remember that I have sought, in my modest way, to make public some of the myths and misconceptions that have been spread, especially by the Labour party. To take up two of his points, there is no reason why the education of three-year-olds should be affected. They are not covered by a deduction of local authority funding. Secondly, local authorities...

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: It is surprising that the hon. Lady delivered her question without a trace of a smile, because it is quintessentially the existence of the voucher, which she and her hon. Friends object to, that is creating choice. Any parent, whether in her local authority area or others, who is satisfied with present local authority provision has simply to ensure that they take up that provision when the...

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: Forty private and voluntary sector providers did not have four-year-olds on roll at the time of applying to join the nursery voucher scheme but had the capacity to provide for them.

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I cannot give the hon. Gentleman the exact proportion that he seeks because I do not have that information. There are new providers in the private and voluntary sector, and I should have thought that he would welcome that, particularly as he knows—he is a member of the relevant Standing Committee—that checks are being built in to ensure high standards. As for his comment about money being...

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Nursery Voucher Scheme (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: My hon. Friend is absolutely right. He will know that we are awaiting precise details of any Opposition proposals. Despite the passage of legislation through the House, we still await that information. There is no doubt that the voucher gives parents a greater say than does the present system, and it should be welcomed on that ground alone.

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Education Services (Inspection) (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: On 7 May, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced that she would examine whether to extend Ofsted's powers to inspect local education authorities' monitoring and support services for schools. A voluntary LEA-Ofsted exercise is under way.

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Education Services (Inspection) (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I am delighted to hear that I can add Hastings to the parts of the country that have benefited from and welcomed a visit by my right hon. Friend on her travels around the country. On the substance of my hon. Friend's question, she is clearly right to recognise that local education authorities can play a significant role in helping schools to raise standards, not least through the quality of...

Oral Answers to Questions — Education and Employment: Education Services (Inspection) (22 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman added the last part of his question; I would otherwise have some sympathy with the position that he described. It is, of course, regrettable when planned inspections do not take place. Although that applies to a relatively small proportion of all inspections, I join the hon. Gentleman in regretting it when it happens. I hope that he will join me in welcoming...

Orders of the Day — Reading Tuition (Primary Schools) (14 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Colne Valley (Mr. Riddick) for raising this subject, and for the thoughtful and intelligent way in which he developed his argument. He has long established a reputation for knowledge in this sphere of education and for not being afraid to express strong opinions. I welcome that, as does the House, and I thought that tonight he gave an excellent...

Orders of the Day — Nursery Education (Grants) (14 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: The hon. Member for Liverpool, Walton (Mr. Kilfoyle) has given no good reason for Opposition Members to object to the regulations. They do no more than enable the Secretary of State to pay grant to providers in the state, the private and the voluntary sectors in exchange for nursery education for four-year-olds. The expansion of quality nursery education is, as I have been told many times by...

Orders of the Day — Nursery Education (Grants) (14 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: I am delighted to confirm what my hon Friend has said. As he may know, in terms of vouchers issued as a percentage of the estimated number of parents, the Norfolk figure is 93 per cent. At the very least that suggests that the problems that the hon Member for Walton hinted at are not universal. It comes ill from the hon Member to jibe at the fact that there were just four volunteer LEAs...

Orders of the Day — Nursery Education (Grants) (14 May 1996)

Mr Robin Squire: Game, set and match to my hon Friend, not least because, as the House will remember, we are regularly told that Conservative authorities have not been good at LEA provision. As my hon. Friend makes clear, Wandsworth has been doing well. The voluntary nature of phase 1 makes it all the more surprising that Opposition Members have prayed against the regulations. The local authorities...


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.