Results 221–240 of 4683 for speaker:Mr Jack Diamond

Dividend Restraint (6 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I recognise that it is in the national interest that restraint should be exercised on all sides. Perhaps I could report—I think that it has already been made clear to the House—that the total aggregate amount of dividend paid during 1968 was less than the figure for 1965 and 1966, less than 103½ per cent. of the figure for 1967. In short, we are below target all the way through.

Dividend Restraint (6 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: The position remains exactly the same until the end of December. If the hon. Gentleman has any particular problem in mind the Treasury has always been willing to try to assist by discussion. We have found at the end of the day that every single company has been able to subscribe to the scheme.

Dividend Restraint (6 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I have answered that question twice, but I will answer it a third time. I find it sufficiently onerous to exercise my responsibilities as a Treasury Minister without exercising the responsibilities of the whole of the Government. My right hon. Friend the First Secretary would be only too glad to answer the question if the hon. Gentleman puts it to her.

Dividend Restraint (6 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I will certainly bear the second part of the question in mind. What the right hon. Gentleman said about investment falling, and the statement by the Chancellor yesterday, is quite inaccurate. Dealing with the first part of the right hon. Gentleman's question, when he asked me whether this is the end of legal restraint, that was covered precisely in my statement, when I dealt with the extent...

Dividend Restraint (6 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: The Government are always doing something sensible.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Interest Rates (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I do not think such an investigation would be useful.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Interest Rates (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: No, Sir. My hon. Friend asks me in the Question whether an investigation will be helpful. I do not think that it would be. My hon. Friend is quoting cases of which he is aware without investigation and which reflect to a certain extent the market rates.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Interest Rates (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: We were aware of those circumstances, and the result is contained in what my right hon. Friend said in answer to the previous Question.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Tax Revenue (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I have nothing to add to the answer which I gave to the hon. Gentleman on 20th May, 1969.—[Vol. 784, c. 222-3.]

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Management and Investment Companies (Management Expenses) (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: Appeals in respect of relief for management expenses by management and investment companies lie only to the Special Commissioners. The number of such cases settled by the Special Commissioners in 1967 and 1968 is not readily available.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Management and Investment Companies (Management Expenses) (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: No, I would not. I do not see the relevance of that. This is a matter of what expenses are appropriately deductible for tax purposes.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Scottish Budget (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: Departments have not kept a detailed record of their work on this question, but I estimate that the total cost was rather more than £3,000.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Scottish Budget (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: The hon. Gentleman asked me what was the cost to public funds, and I have given him the answer —the cost to public funds. Therefore, I have not to deal with the other irrelevant points he has just put to me.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Scottish Budget (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I cannot accept responsibility for everything which has gone on in this House over the last 17 years.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Public Sector Purchasing (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: The new group will be concerned with standardisation and variety reduction in public sector purchasing. Further progress in these fields should itself be of benefit to exports, but I do not think it would be useful to extend the group's terms of reference as suggested.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Public Sector Purchasing (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I do not know whether they could easily do so. I certainly share the implicit view of my hon. Friend that they should endeavour to do so.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Public Sector Purchasing (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: The answer to the first part of the right hon. Gentleman's question is "Not yet". I certainly undertake to do what he asks in the second part of his question.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Value-Added Tax (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: I have nothing to add to what my hon. and learned Friend the Financial Secretary said in reply to a similar Question from my hon. Friend the Member for Heywood and Royton (Mr. Barnett) on 29th January, but I would not seriously quarrel with the figure of 8,000 given in the N.E.D.C. report on a broad estimate of the numbers required by Customs and Excise to operate a tax stopping at the...

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Value-Added Tax (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: It is no more odd than many of the other suggestions made by that party.

Oral Answers to Questions — National Finance: Value-Added Tax (4 Nov 1969)

Mr Jack Diamond: That would depend on the rates and coverage of the tax.


Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.