Results 61–80 of 475 for speaker:Mr Albert Murray

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railway Stations (Passenger Facilities) (24 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: No, Sir. This is essentially a matter of management for the Railways Board.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railway Stations (Passenger Facilities) (24 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: My hon. Friend can make representations directly to British Rail or to the appropriate transport users consultative committee.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railway Stations (Passenger Facilities) (24 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: Again, this is a matter of day-to-day management for British Railways. No doubt the hon. Member has made his representations known elsewhere.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railway Stations (Passenger Facilities) (24 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: As usual, that is an entirely different question.

British Waterways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: I was somewhat disappointed with the speech of the hon. Member for the Cities of London and Westminister (Mr. John Smith) because at the outset he quoted Noel Coward's remark about the non-nationalisation possibilities of sex. The hon. Gentleman said that he would give us an illustration of that. In the event, however, he did not do so, to the disappointment of the whole House, especially on...

British Railways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: This has been an interesting debate which has ranged from rural Berkshire to the busy new Thamesmead area and taken in a local derby in football terms. My hon. Friend the Member for Erith and Crayford (Mr. Wellbeloved) and the hon. Member for Abingdon (Mr. Neave) mentioned that no hon. Member was promoting the Bill on behalf of British Railways. I understand that it is not normal for an hon....

British Railways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: I hope that I can answer some of the points that have been made.

British Railways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: I did not intervene once in the hon. Gentleman's speech, and I think I should be allowed to answer as many points as I can. If they are not covered, I am certain that the hon. Member, who has not been backward in coming forward in giving British Railways the rough end of his tongue, will be on to them with further letters or telephone calls. As I was saying, this Bill is one of a series. I...

British Railways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: According to the comment which this Bill has aroused, it is difficult enough to speak for British Railways, let alone the right hon. Member for Bexley (Mr. Heath). I must point out to my hon. Friend the Member for West Ham, North (Mr. Arthur Lewis) that Erith and Crayford comes within the Greater London Borough of Bexley and that is why we have that name mentioned. Subsection (2) further...

British Railways Bill (19 Mar 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: They might not have understood before tonight. I am certain that they will understand after tonight. As I pointed out to the hon. Gentleman, he has received an apology saying that their omission was an error in administration, and they have informed me that they did not intend any discourtesy. But, although hon. Members rightly want to know statutory proposals for matters which affect their...

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Channel Tunnel (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: Proposals have not yet been formally submitted to the Governments by the private groups.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Channel Tunnel (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: There have been as yet no formal proposals. I understand that a report appeared in a newspaper last week that formal proposals had been received, but this is not so. In reply to the hon. Gentleman's second point, there is no difference between the Governments on this matter.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Channel Tunnel (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: I cannot at this stage give any date for the starting of the tunnel.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Channel Tunnel (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: In reply to the first part of the supplementary question, we are not being misleading. Negotiations are going on, and the very fact that there are negotiations means that the Government cannot and will not lay down the timetable suggested by the hon. Gentleman.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Continental Countries (British Lorries) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: The total effect of road haulage quotas on British industry cannot be accurately quantified but is cer- tainly small in volume. We would naturally prefer to do away with these quotas altogether if the other Governments concerned would agree. In the meantime we shall do our utmost to negotiate quotas which are adequate to the needs of trade.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Continental Countries (British Lorries) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: All quotas are on a reciprocal basis and are subject to review. The hon. Member no doubt will know that we have just negotiated an increase in the Anglo-Italian quota and new discussions on the Anglo-French quota are to take place at the end of February.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Blyth-Cambois (Ferry Service) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: The local authorities concerned wrote to the Department on 29th January to ask whether they would qualify for Government grant, under Section 34 of the Transport Act, 1968, in respect of any financial support they might themselves give to the ferry. The detailed information they have given is being studied and we hope to reach a decision soon.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Blyth-Cambois (Ferry Service) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: We are aware of the desire by local authorities that we should act speedily, but since this is the first application of its kind it needs a great deal of detailed study. We will give an answer as soon as possible.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railways (Route Mileage) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: Figures for 1st January, 1970, are not yet available. They will be published, as usual, in the Railways Board's Annual Report for 1969. Total track mileage in use on 1st January, 1969, was 33,976. The decline in route mileage between 1st January, 1965, and 1st January, 1969, was 22·2 per cent.; between 1st January, 1960, and 1st January, 1965, it was 13·5 per cent.

Oral Answers to Questions — Transport: Railways (Route Mileage) (24 Feb 1970)

Mr Albert Murray: We do not say that. What the hon. Gentleman has to take into consideration is the fact that percentages do not tell the whole story and that the Government—[Interruption.] One can always tell when the Opposition are not going to like what is about to be said. They start to jeer. The Government are paying nearly £60 million per annum to keep open socially desirable services.


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.