Results 1–20 of 1229 for speaker:Lord Clinton-Davis

Committee (1st Day) (12 Jan 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: Am I right in saying that the maritime unions have raised no objections to the name of this organisation?

Transport: Infrastructure — Statement (15 Jan 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, is it not clear that the Opposition had absolutely nothing to say about the three European airports mentioned by my noble friend? They had nothing to say about jobs in or around Heathrow Airport. They had nothing to say about the new generation of aircraft that are coming on line. Are these not highly relevant as far as the issue that we are considering is concerned? Has not the...

Israel and Palestine: Gaza — Question (20 Jan 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords—

Israel and Palestine: Gaza — Question (20 Jan 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, does my noble friend agree—

Israel and Palestine: Gaza — Question (20 Jan 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, enlarging on what the Minister has just said, may I ask what the Government are doing to ensure that the fragile peace can be converted into a durable settlement?

Gaza — Motion to Take Note (6 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, I turn immediately to my noble friend Lord Stone whom all of us wish was the leader of the world. All the problems of the Middle East would be solved if his trade plans were followed. Although I applaud his optimism, I do not think that he has all the answers to our present problems. The situation in Gaza is indeed tragic and complex. No civilised person could fail to be moved by...

Gaza — Question (9 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, is not the top priority now to examine the possibility of working out a permanent peace settlement, in view of the tremendously fragile character of the situation at present?

Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]: Second Reading (11 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, will my noble friend say something about Clause 47 referring to "Restriction on studies"? How pervasive will it be? Does he agree that it needs further clarification?

Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]: Second Reading (11 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, I am rather uneasy about certain aspects of the Bill, although some parts of it are fine and deserve our support. I pity immigration practitioners because they have to deal with so many laws, and at present the situation is rather imperfect. Let us take, for example, the conferring of too much power, as I believe, on immigration officials. They are able to determine the linguistic...

Airports: Canada Geese — Question (23 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to prevent an influx of Canada geese from causing damage to airlines, runways and other infrastructure at Heathrow and other United Kingdom airports.

Airports: Canada Geese — Question (23 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. In doing so, I declare an interest as the president of BALPA.

Airports: Canada Geese — Question (23 Feb 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for that Answer. Is it not right that large flocks of birds, or large birds, constitute a special problem that ought to be avoided if possible? Does it not illustrate the dangers of the development of estuarial airports, such as Maplin, favoured by the Mayor of London? It is one of the reasons, is it not, why the CAA turned that proposal down?

Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]: Committee (Second Day) (2 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: I adopt entirely the arguments of the noble Lord, Lord Hylton. I cannot understand why the burden of proof should shift on to refugees to satisfy the requirement that they were not at any time during the qualifying immigration period in the UK in breach of immigration laws. I also adopt the argument he adduced that it is impossible for the Government to opt out of their international...

Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]: Committee (Second Day) (2 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: The UNHCR has taken the trouble to write to a number of noble Lords about this issue. It is all very well for the Minister to say that the Government will listen carefully to what has been said but we need something more positive. The Government ought to take into account what the UNHCR is arguing, which is much more positive than what he has just said.

Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Bill [HL]: Committee (Second Day) (2 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: As I said before, the UNHCR considers this issue to be of paramount importance and many Members of this Committee share that view. What I would like the Minister to say is not that the Government will consider the issue but that the Government will be in touch with the UNHCR to derive from it the conditions that it is setting. We should be in absolute obeisance to what it has to say.

Banking: Asset Protection Scheme — Statement (9 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, the Minister referred in his Statement to the broader reform of banking supervision and regulation. May I ask him for further and better particulars about that? What does he have in mind about banking supervision? Surely it will take place immediately. Is that right? Is Parliament to be consulted about the regulations? When will they be made, if at all?

Written Answers — House of Lords: Airports: Landing Slots (13 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: To ask Her Majesty's Government what consultations they have had about the use of current take-off and landing slots at United Kingdom airports in general, and Heathrow in particular.

Written Answers — House of Lords: Aviation: BMI (13 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have been consulted about the proposed take-over of BMI by Lufthansa.

Political Parties and Elections Bill: Second Reading (18 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, does not the increase from £200 to £500 represent an increase way above the current rate of inflation? Why is that?

Political Parties and Elections Bill: Second Reading (18 Mar 2009)

Lord Clinton-Davis: My Lords, would it not have been possible to have investigated the situation from year to year, rather than come to a figure now, which is very difficult to justify?


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.