Results 7981–8000 of 8309 for speaker:Kevan Jones

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 10 - Proceedings of licensing committee (10 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I am intrigued by the hon. Gentleman's line of argument, and I wonder whether he could give an example. When I, like many hon. Members, served in local government we were quietly governed by the standing orders and offers of advice from the chief legal officer, which would not have allowed us to simply bang such a thing on the agenda at the last minute without notice.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 10 - Proceedings of licensing committee (10 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I am not sure in what strange councils Conservative members have been operating. Perhaps they could give an example of a planning application, or any controversial decision, being dealt with under delegated powers. I challenge the hon. Gentleman to give an example of the things he mentions actually being done.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 7 - Licensing committees (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: But will not some cases be delegated rather than being subject to full hearings of the licensing authority?

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 7 - Licensing committees (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Can the hon. Gentleman explain why it would not be appropriate for councillors to sit on a planning committee as well as a licensing committee?

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 7 - Licensing committees (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Unfortunately, the Bill should be renamed the Westminster city council Bill because everything seems to be being skewed towards Westminster. Is it not a fact that if there were more councillors, more officials would be needed to administer the paper work and to prepare for the committees? As my hon. Friend the Member for Waveney (Mr. Blizzard) said, increasing the number of councillors is...

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 5 - General duties of licensing authorities (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman is adopting new Labour tactics. When he conducted his survey, did he point out to the residents in his constituency that under this Bill they will have a direct say in the granting of licences for the first time? That fact may have been withheld from them until now.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 5 - General duties of licensing authorities (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Is not the problem the fact that the clause defines culture? Some people think that morris dancing and high art are culture, while others consider that Newcastle brown and football are part of the culture in the north-east.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing authorities (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Is it not the case at present that local authorities can give themselves planning permission on land that they own?

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing authorities (8 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: It is good for the ratepayers.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I wish to speak against the amendment. I support the transfer of responsibility for the licensing of premises to local authorities. Local authorities already administer public entertainment licences, and do so well in my experience. They also deal with issues such as taxi licences, door registration schemes—in certain parts of the country—and planning applications. They have a...

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I appreciate that, and that is why the fees will need to reflect the type of enforcement that there will be. However, at the moment, we have a system whereby a local authority can set a fee for a public entertainment licence which bears no resemblance whatsoever to its enforcement in practice. It is important that, if publicans and other people apply for a public entertainment licence, they...

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Authorities cannot do that, and I do not believe that that is what the Bill is expecting them to do. At the moment one has to re-apply every year, which is burdensome for the licensees. It serves no useful purpose. If a public house, restaurant or a nightclub is run professionally and is well maintained with no disorder, why do those involved have to pay a fee each year? The provision will...

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: I appreciate that the hon. Gentleman is not a member of Westminster City council, but is the money raised from current public entertainment licences ring-fenced for enforcement in Westminster?

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Clearly it depends on the type of licence. If they are on-licences, that might be the case, but if the pubs have public entertainment licences, as they are in the constituency of the hon. Member for Cities of London and Westminster and given the rates that Westminster council charges, it would be more than £200,000.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Does the hon. Gentleman agree that as a result of this legislation, certainly in Westminster because of the stealth tax imposed by the Conservative council, people who have public entertainment licences will make substantial savings?

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Clause 3 - Licensing Authorities (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: Would there not be a saving to individual premises? At the moment, those without a public entertainment licence have to apply for a separate licence and expense would be involved in that. Fees also vary from council to council. In the constituency of the hon. Member for Cities of London and Westminster, some licences cost £20,000 a year.

Public Bill Committee: Licensing Bill [Lords]: Schedule 1 - Provision of regulated entertainment (3 Apr 2003)

Kevan Jones: The students union in Durham is in the centre of the city and is an integral part of the university and so is the students union at Newcastle university. Noise and public safety issues will clearly arise, but the students union in Durham would have something to say if its activities could not be licensed. Therefore I disagree with the hon. Gentleman. A public nuisance could be created in...


Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.