Results 61–80 of 816 for speaker:Ken Purchase

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: The cave from which I emerged is rather better than the one that the hon. Gentleman may be going to. Notwithstanding that, I think that an important omission has been made, appearing to suggest we live in a monocultural place. It is unfortunate that it should be presented in that way. I want to speak briefly on amendment 121. My right hon. Friend the Member for Don Valley rightly made the...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: The words are interesting, to say the least, but is the response that children will not leave school without reaching a certain level a guarantee? What does it mean? The Minister has already inquired whether the words mean that the children will not leave school without the particular qualification. Does the Conservative party mean that? Would it keep children in school until they have that...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: I want to be honest and straightforward in an attempt to be helpful. Everyone in the room knows exactly what the hon. Gentleman means, but it is  a question of the wording, which is ambivalent, to say the least. It needs tidying up because it can be read as, “No child can leave still struggling.” It is ambivalent, and it would be helpful to get some clarity on the matter.

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: Selective memory is wonderful. I will say two words: league tables. The hon. Gentleman’s Government, under Mrs. Thatcher and others, introduced league tables, poisoning the atmosphere in schools through what they had to do to show that they were better and different from the school next door. My party, unfortunately, has continued with that poisoned chalice, but we are at least, and have...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: It is worth discussing that point: who inspects the inspectors? That is always the question; but in this instance we are talking about an already very sophisticated professional inspection system that exists to ensure that the pedagogy is correct and properly worked out. The layout in question—the ombudsman intervention—is very worthwhile. It has proved to be so in every other area...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: Will the hon. Gentleman say a little more about this particular subject? It seems to me that there is already in place a professional inspection of schools, curriculum, pedagogy and so on and so forth. Surely the job of the ombudsman will be to ensure that the administration is being done competently and properly—as he does in every other complaint—and not impede the professional...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mrs. Anderson. My hon. Friend the Minister gives us some illustrations of what he means by a guarantee, and I take it as read that the definition will be in the Bill and that it will be what he means it to be. However, I understand that the meaning of a word is what a judge in court might say it is within the context in which that word is...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: This question of one-to-one tuition is at the heart of the guarantee and the resolution of difficulties. It seems to me that one-to-one tuition and small group work are ideal ways of resolving problems for parents who feel that their children are not receiving the sort of tuition that will guarantee those particular outcomes. The hon. Member for Yeovil is right to say that this is...

Public Bill Committee: Children, Schools and Families Bill: Clause 1 (26 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr. Amess. This is my first Bill Committee since 1999—I cannot understand why, but there we are. I would like to dwell for a few moments on the question of inclusion or exclusion from the guarantee. I am broadly in favour of the guarantees under the Bill. I acknowledge that there will be difficulties in their implementation, but I am...

Oral Answers to Questions — Health: NHS (Charitable Funding) (12 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: And never has been.

Oral Answers to Questions — Defence: Children, Schools and Families Bill (11 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: Of course we can use statistics in this way, but the truth is that those academies that have improved at a faster rate have been matched by the other secondary schools in their boroughs. That shows that there is nothing particularly special about academies.

Oral Answers to Questions — Defence: Children, Schools and Families Bill (11 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: I really wanted to talk about academies, but if we ask that question, we find a great body of education theory and practice that shows that, at an older age, children respond better one to one and that, at a younger age, they often respond better in small groups. That is the theory behind what the Secretary of State is saying.

Oral Answers to Questions — Defence: Children, Schools and Families Bill (11 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: And he was opposed to academies.

Oral Answers to Questions — Defence: Children, Schools and Families Bill (11 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: This is at the heart of the Bill; the most important reform that the Secretary of State is introducing is the possibility of one-to-one tuition, catch-up support and so on. What guarantees can he give us that middle-class parents will not "snaffle"-I use that term for want of a better word-all those resources because they have the loudest voices and the best understanding and will demand that...

Oral Answers to Questions — Defence: Children, Schools and Families Bill (11 Jan 2010)

Ken Purchase: On the point about the ability to run chains of schools, which the Secretary of State has been promoting, I must note that one such chain has been debarred from taking on any more schools. Does he therefore accept that there ought at least to be a default position whereby local authorities can take over an entire chain and re-establish a proper educational approach to such schools? Does he...

Oral Answers to Questions — Treasury: Remuneration Levels (15 Dec 2009)

Ken Purchase: If he will commission comparative research into levels of remuneration in (a) the banking sector and (b) the public sector; and if he will make a statement.

Oral Answers to Questions — Treasury: Remuneration Levels (15 Dec 2009)

Ken Purchase: But does the Minister understand the anger that is reflected in the response of public sector workers to the pre-Budget report, when they see the incomes being given, granted to or thrown at the banking sector? Does he not understand that he must take further measures in order to redress the balance? When the economy returns to good health, will he make public sector pay a priority for the...

Business of the House ( 3 Dec 2009)

Ken Purchase: Does the Leader of the House recall that when the miners went on strike in order to protect the pits, they were denounced as traitors in the press? Does this morning's action by the bankers remind her of that? Can we expect a similar condemnation? Furthermore, those precious, self-centred people need to be brought here and cautioned for what they are saying about their position. They are...

Oral Answers to Questions — Children, Schools and Families: Hospital Trusts (Essex) (30 Nov 2009)

Ken Purchase: Will the Secretary of State accept that the obsession with structures, trusts and foundation trusts is entirely irrelevant to the level of care that we expect in our hospitals? Will he understand that the spending of a million pounds a throw on foundation trusts is simply a waste of money, and that the best work he can do is to put more money into front-line services, get rid of all this...


<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

Create an alert

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.