Results 181–200 of 976 for speaker:Professor Ross Cranston

Oral Answers to Questions — Crown Prosecution Service (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: All hon. Members should have received letters from chief Crown prosecutors in their area, and I would encourage them to make contact with them. CCPs now have greater autonomy in their areas. In addition, the areas are coterminous with the police authorities, so there should be more efficient operation of both the CPS and the police.

Oral Answers to Questions — Crown Prosecution Service (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: We have been in power for less than two years. We have acted quickly. The right hon. and learned Gentleman was in office for a long time. As soon as we took office we appointed Sir lain Glidewell to review the CPS. It was only proper that he should consider it carefully, and his report has been widely commended. We are now acting on it. As I said in reply to the hon. Member for Southend, West...

Oral Answers to Questions — Government Legal Work (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: Following the implementation of his new appointment procedures, in accordance with which the vacancies are widely advertised, my right hon. and learned Friend the Attorney-General has recently appointed 48 junior counsel to the Crown C panel. An advertisement inviting applications for the London A and B panels was placed last month, and he will make new appointments to those panels in the...

Oral Answers to Questions — Government Legal Work (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: It is a pity that my hon. Friend was not able to apply for a position on the panel. The new procedure attracted a large number of exceptionally good applicants, and we have made some very good appointment. It was important to open up the procedure and make it transparent. My hon. Friend makes a valid point about the appointments of counsel in the provinces. As I said, we are in the process...

Oral Answers to Questions — Government Legal Work (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I can certainly give that assurance. The decisions were made by a panel appointed by the Attorney-General, but neither he nor I had any involvement in the process.

Oral Answers to Questions — Acquittals (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: Such cases should always be considered carefully so that the reasons for the acquittal can be established. In some cases the reasons are clear. Where they are not, the Crown Prosecution Service is sympathetic to holding such meetings. The CPS routinely conducts an analysis of all acquittals in the Crown court. A report is prepared by the caseworker who has attended court with counsel, and...

Oral Answers to Questions — Acquittals (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I am aware of the very sad case to which my hon. Friend referred. Juries sometimes come to inexplicable conclusions, as anyone who has been involved with jury trials knows. That does not mean that the jury was wrong, or that it was wrong for the CPS to bring the case. It is simply the nature of the process. Juries can come to unexpected conclusions. There is a good case for debriefing on a...

Oral Answers to Questions — Acquittals (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I am not aware of the case that the hon. Gentleman has raised. If he writes to me, I shall look into it. The CPS receives reports of adverse performance by particular counsel, as a result of which such counsel might not be briefed in the future. Both the hon. Gentleman and my hon. Friend the Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) have raised a serious matter, and I shall look into it.

Oral Answers to Questions — Hamilton v. Al Fayed (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: Treasury Counsel's fees and the costs of the Treasury Solicitors Department in that case came to a combined total of £13,451.

Oral Answers to Questions — Hamilton v. Al Fayed (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: That did not involve any fee on my part.

Oral Answers to Questions — Hamilton v. Al Fayed (22 Apr 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: We entered as a neutral party. That was accepted in the Court of Appeal decision. We were not taking sides on behalf of Mr. Hamilton or on behalf of the defendant. We were putting the important arguments raised with us by the House authorities on the parliamentary privilege point. The Court of Appeal accepted the important point that we made about the courts respecting the procedures of the...

Oral Answers to Questions — Attorney-General: Crown Prosecution Service (20 May 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: Sir Iain Glidewell's review of the CPS made three recommendations specific to London. First, that CPS London should be organised broadly along the same lines as other CPS areas covering large conurbations. This has been accepted. A new chief Crown prosecutor for London has been appointed, supported by an area business manager. Secondly, Sir kin recommended that assistant chief Crown...

Oral Answers to Questions — Attorney-General: Crown Prosecution Service (20 May 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I would not dare, Madam Speaker, given what you have said. I can tell my hon. Friend who is assiduous in pursuing criminal justice issues in his area, that there are no plans at present to transfer work that is being undertaken by the Bexley team at London Bridge to Croydon. Also, as a result of an earlier review, the branch has already implemented a system whereby a dedicated team of staff...

Oral Answers to Questions — Attorney-General: Private Sector Lawyers (20 May 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: The Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office have no immediate plans to increase the use of private sector lawyers. The CPS is working with the Bar to foster closer working relationships while seeking to increase the use of in-house lawyers employed by the CPS who have achieved success in obtaining the higher court advocacy qualification. The aim is to increase competition,...

Oral Answers to Questions — Attorney-General: Private Sector Lawyers (20 May 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: All prosecution services can instruct private sector lawyers or in-house lawyers with the higher court advocacy qualification. The decision depends on the circumstances of the case. There has been no significant change in their use recently, one way or the other. My hon. Friend's comment has a certain validity. If there are suitable local lawyers, I am sure that the CPS will consider...

Oral Answers to Questions — Attorney-General: Private Sector Lawyers (20 May 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I am sure that we would encourage lawyers in private practice to join the CPS. The CPS advertises and has very flexible arrangements for extended leave. That is particularly advantageous to married women who may go on maternity leave and then want to stay away for longer. We encourage outside people to apply to the CPS. No stigma will attach to those who left service some time ago.

Clause 11: Costs in Funded Cases (22 Jun 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I beg to move amendment No. 12, in page 9, line 32, leave out 'cases in which services have been' and insert 'relation to proceedings in which services are'.

Clause 11: Costs in Funded Cases (22 Jun 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: This group of drafting amendments is consequential to an amendment made in Committee to what is now clause 11(1). Clause 11 deals with the award of costs between the parties in cases involving community legal service funding. It gives assisted persons broadly the same statutory protection against costs as exists now. Clause 11(1) was amended in Committee to provide for that protection to be...

Clause 22: Position of Service Providers and Other Parties (22 Jun 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: I beg to move amendment No. 18, in page 16, line 17, leave out second 'of' and insert 'to'.

Clause 22: Position of Service Providers and Other Parties (22 Jun 1999)

Professor Ross Cranston: This group of amendments clarifies the powers to prescribe the procedures for courts carrying out functions under part I of the Bill, particularly in relation to granting rights to representation in criminal cases. It also includes a number of consequential and drafting amendments. Let me explain. Amendment No. 19 provides a general power to prescribe which member or officer of a court is...


<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >>

Create an alert

Did you find what you were looking for?

Advanced search

Find this exact word or phrase

You can also do this from the main search box by putting exact words in quotes: like "cycling" or "hutton report"

By default, we show words related to your search term, like “cycle” and “cycles” in a search for cycling. Putting the word in quotes, like "cycling", will stop this.

Excluding these words

You can also do this from the main search box by putting a minus sign before words you don’t want: like hunting -fox

We also support a bunch of boolean search modifiers, like AND and NEAR, for precise searching.

Date range

to

You can give a start date, an end date, or both to restrict results to a particular date range. A missing end date implies the current date, and a missing start date implies the oldest date we have in the system. Dates can be entered in any format you wish, e.g. 3rd March 2007 or 17/10/1989

Person

Enter a name here to restrict results to contributions only by that person.

Section

Restrict results to a particular parliament or assembly that we cover (e.g. the Scottish Parliament), or a particular type of data within an institution, such as Commons Written Answers.

Column

If you know the actual Hansard column number of the information you are interested in (perhaps you’re looking up a paper reference), you can restrict results to that; you can also use column:123 in the main search box.