Reporting a comment

Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!

Robbie G
Posted on 14 Jan 2005 2:14 pm

As Mr Ingram knows full well, the US did not sign the above treaty in respect of use of napalm.
There have also been reports of US Marine Corp personnel confirming the use of mark-77s.
See http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/08/1060145870882.html...

"I can confirm that Mark-77 fire bombs were used in that general area," said Colonel Mike Daily, of the US Marine Corps.

Colonel Daily said that US stocks of Vietnam-era napalm had been phased out, but that the Mark-77s had "similar destructive characteristics".


Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.