Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.

Donate to our crowdfunder

Reporting a comment

Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!

Posted on 16 Feb 2006 1:40 am

It is often stated that if you constantly quote something that is totally incorrect ,the mere repetition gives it the credibility that it does not deserve.These "facts" are nothing more than anti smoking rhetoric and arise from bad science and a political agenda.Even the commons select committee on health refrained from making too much on ets.The american eps were taken to court for their manipulation of figures relating to their "findings" of the risk of passive smoking yet their original figures are often "mischieviously" quoted.If lung cancer is so directly related to smoking then why are we still using computer modules and not real cancer death information.It may also explain the anomaly in the usa ,lung cancer deaths are dramatically increasing yet smoking is on the decrease.Let's get the facts straight from the start.

Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.