Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!
Matt Turner Posted on 23 Sep 2013 5:49 pm
I don't think this calculation is correct.
I estimate that about 30% of LSTF funding went towards cycling projects.
Assuming a UK population of 63.23 million people, he's using a parliamentary term of 4 years.
Recalculation gives: Funding (£600m*0.3 + £277m) = £457m Population 63.23m 4 year parliament
£1.81/person/year.
NOT £3.50!
Why should this annotation be deleted? Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.
Matt Turner
Posted on 23 Sep 2013 5:49 pm
I don't think this calculation is correct.
I estimate that about 30% of LSTF funding went towards cycling projects.
Assuming a UK population of 63.23 million people, he's using a parliamentary term of 4 years.
Recalculation gives: Funding (£600m*0.3 + £277m) = £457m Population 63.23m 4 year parliament
£1.81/person/year.
NOT £3.50!