Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!
Posted on 27 Jun 2012 12:05 pm
This is a bit of shutting the stable door - why does the department have to wait for cyclists to be killed or seriously injured before it improves the junctions? The recent Times campaign for safer cycling set up a mechanism which enabled such junctions to be identified, so there is already a database which could be used for targeting this funding.
Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.
Making it easy to keep an eye on the UK’s parliaments. Discover who represents you, how they’ve voted and what they’ve said in debates – simply and clearly.
Get insights on TheyWorkForYou and other mySociety sites, in our popular newsletter
Your donations keep this site and others like it running
mySociety is a registered charity in England and Wales (1076346) and a limited company (03277032). We provide commercial services through our wholly owned subsidiary SocietyWorks Ltd (05798215).