Reporting a comment

Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!

Grace Filby
Posted on 14 May 2009 2:16 pm

As a comment to Mr Blunt's second point, I do have evidence that the DoH were distributing false information and then continued to do so for a while, even after this was pointed out.

The DoH admitted to their error via my Freedom of Information question 1st October 2008. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_facts_about_side_e...

Too late - by October the programme had already begun in Surrey schools. I have no idea whether an erratum was circulated to alert anyone of their mistake, or even whether the Minister Dawn Primarolo knew about it.

Here is the original text of 'Beating cervical cancer - the facts, page 13' until 15th October 2008:

"Other mild side effects such as slightly raised temperature, sickness, diarrhoea and muscle aches were reported in less than one in 1000 people." www.immunisation.nhs.uk/publications/288939_HPV_factsheet.pdf

Here is the amended text:

"Other mild side effects such as slightly raised temperature, sickness, diarrhoea, itching, rash, and joint pain were reported in less than one in ten but more than one in 100 people." www.immunisation.nhs.uk/publications/288939_HPV_Factsheet2.pdf

Spot the difference.....................!


Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.