I am sure holding court in secret is against the law.
Justice is not the same as Just Us.
You may try and fool the people that legal and lawful are the same, but we both know that is a lie.
Considering we are each sovereign beings, then it is up to each individual involved in the case to decide whether they want their cases heard in full open court.
If the judge decides, then he/she is hiding something, or is in collusion with others to hide something.
Using the excuse of best interest of the child, like Hitler did, just about says it all.
Family courts are actually ORDERING THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN in secret, but the service users do not learn this until it is too late.
Any family judge who allows convicted paedophiles to have full custody, and ignore the obvious sexual abuse of children is SICK or brainwashed.
If the people knew the truth of Kangaroo Courts and that courts a re a corporation designed to make profit for their shareholders, then I feel the scam would be over.
Catherine Mills
Posted on 28 Apr 2009 4:45 pm
I am sure holding court in secret is against the law.
Justice is not the same as Just Us.
You may try and fool the people that legal and lawful are the same, but we both know that is a lie.
Considering we are each sovereign beings, then it is up to each individual involved in the case to decide whether they want their cases heard in full open court.
If the judge decides, then he/she is hiding something, or is in collusion with others to hide something.
Using the excuse of best interest of the child, like Hitler did, just about says it all.
Family courts are actually ORDERING THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN in secret, but the service users do not learn this until it is too late.
Any family judge who allows convicted paedophiles to have full custody, and ignore the obvious sexual abuse of children is SICK or brainwashed.
If the people knew the truth of Kangaroo Courts and that courts a re a corporation designed to make profit for their shareholders, then I feel the scam would be over.