Reporting a comment

Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!

Danny Rizo
Posted on 17 Jan 2008 6:58 pm

The Secretary of State is right to say that a "national insurance number on its own cannot be an automatic passport to a job". But does he recognize the fact that without one, the path to employment is completely blocked? In order words it is essential to have one? Does he admit to the fact that if an individual does not have a NINO his chances of gaining legal employment are absolutely and totally zero, thus making the NINO the quintessential document?

Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.