Here's the annotation you're reporting. Please enter a brief reason why you think it should be deleted in the form beneath. Thanks for your help!
Posted on 11 Jun 2005 8:58 pm
For the uninitiated, Puffin crossings are supposed to detect whether there are pedestrians waiting or not before changing colour. They also respond more quickly to a button press. They thus avoid the problem of pressing the button and waiting for ages before the lights change. And avoid the lights changing when no pedestrians are waiting, so cars don't have to stop before empty crossings.
They are a good idea, despite the technology not being perfect. But I really don't like the way that the "green man" display is on the near side post at about shoulder level - rather than on the opposite side at eye level. I inevitably find that people are standing in the way so that I can't see the display. Very annoying. I wonder if the placing of this display compromises their effectiveness in reducing accidents and whether the quoted research is examining this.
Why should this annotation be deleted?
Check our House Rules and tell us why the annotation breaks them.
Making it easy to keep an eye on the UK’s parliaments. Discover who represents you, how they’ve voted and what they’ve said in debates – simply and clearly.
Get insights on TheyWorkForYou and other mySociety sites, in our popular newsletter
Your donations keep this site and others like it running
mySociety is a registered charity in England and Wales (1076346) and a limited company (03277032). We provide commercial services through our wholly owned subsidiary SocietyWorks Ltd (05798215).