Lord Hogan-Howe

Deputy Chairman of Committees

Crossbench Peer

UK Parliament Profile

🗣️ Speeches and Debates

  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day) (Continued): Amendment 393B 11 Mar 2026

    I thank the Minister for giving way. I understand and accept the distinction that she makes. Over the past 20 or 30 years, the concern for the police officers involved is that, on every occasion that the decision has been made, it has been wrong so far as the jury is concerned. It has left the officers believing, sometimes, that the way that the CPS has discharged its problem—with a public...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day) (Continued): Amendment 393B 11 Mar 2026

    Before the noble Lord sits down, could he just consider one thing? He made some very strong points. One thing that concerns the officers—although the noble Lord is quite right to identify that there have been relatively few criminal charges over the period—and the reason they are not persuaded by the CPS, or whoever is making the decision, taking into account only sufficiency of evidence...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day) (Continued): Amendment 393B 11 Mar 2026

    My Lords, I shall speak to just two amendments, Amendments 393B and 394. Amendment 393B is the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, has introduced about anonymity. Noble Lords will not be surprised to hear that I do not agree with him. However, I shared with him a few days ago that I have some sympathy with the general position. Police officers should be accountable and one of the...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day): Amendment 391 11 Mar 2026

    May I address that simple point? To be clear, in these cases, the IOPC is the investigating body. It is in full possession of the information it has gained—interviews, evidence from the scene, et cetera—so it is in a good position to query criminal charge or, at that stage, query misconduct charge, but it waits until the end of the whole process to instigate the misconduct charge that it...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day): Amendment 391 11 Mar 2026

    My Lords, I have added my name to this amendment, which the noble Lord, Lord Davies, set out the case for very well. It is linked particularly to the Chris Kaba case. I will try to address the points made by the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham. He made a fair point. There are times when, even if someone has been acquitted of a criminal offence—in this case, a charge of murder—disciplinary...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day): Amendment 391 11 Mar 2026

    I am not going to try to argue the case; I am making my argument, and the noble Viscount is making his. The other regulatory bodies do not have something called the IOPC, a body that is charged with investigating this type of thing. That is fine, but it imposes a further burden and further process. Two groups are badly affected: the family of the person who has died and the officer in the...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (5th Day): Amendment 385 11 Mar 2026

    My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 385, moved by the noble Lord, Lord Jackson, and Amendment 386 from the noble Lord, Lord Bailey. On Amendment 385, masks on cyclists are a difficult area. We all know that cyclists wear masks for reasons of keeping their mouth warm when it is cold. Not everybody who covers their face is a criminal. However, it is clear that some groups of criminals are...
  • Crime and Policing Bill - Report (4th Day) (Continued): Amendment 380 9 Mar 2026

    My Lords, I do not support the amendment. The noble Lord, Lord Pannick, made the point that there will obviously be regulations, because people do have fears about accessing the DVLA database. At the moment, the only database that facial comparisons are made against is that of suspects, which is a substantial database of people the police have arrested in the past. It would be a bizarre...

More of Lord Hogan-Howe's speeches and debates

✍️ Written Questions and Answers

More of Lord Hogan-Howe's written questions