Ministers Intervening in Inquests
There have been votes in Parliament on the powers of ministers to intervene in inquests. Specific votes were held on questions including if the Secretary of State ought be able to order a coroner's inquest to take place without a jury and if a minister ought be able to suspend a coroner's inquest.
Lord Lansley generally voted against allowing ministers to intervene in inquests
TheyWorkForYou has automatically calculated this MP’s stance based on all
of their votes on the topic. You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk.
On 10 Jun 2008:
Lord Lansley voted yes on Counter-Terrorism Bill — Disallow inquests without a jury in England and Wales — rejected
On 10 Jun 2008:
Lord Lansley voted yes on Counter Terrorism Bill — Lord Chief Justice to appoint "special coroners" — rejected
On 26 Jan 2009:
Lord Lansley was absent for a vote on Coroners and Justice Bill — Condemn the Coroners and Justice Bill — rejected
On 9 Nov 2009:
Lord Lansley voted against allowing the Lord Chancellor (a minister) to suspend an inquest and replace it with an inquiry and against allowing the use of intercepted communications evidence in inquests.
On 12 Nov 2009:
Lord Lansley was absent for a vote on Coroners and Justice Bill — Schedule 1 — Explicit Approval of Lord Chief Justice Required for Minister to Suspend Coroner's Inquiry -rejected
Note for journalists and researchers: The data on this page may be used freely,
on condition that TheyWorkForYou.com is cited as the source.
For an explanation of the vote descriptions please see the FAQ entries on
vote descriptions and
how the voting record is decided