Clause 59

Health and Social Care Bill – in a Public Bill Committee at 2:00 pm on 17 March 2011.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Simon Burns Simon Burns The Minister of State, Department of Health 2:00, 17 March 2011

I beg to move amendment 495, in clause 59, page 67, line 24, at end insert ‘and that the failure is significant’.

Photo of Mike Hancock Mike Hancock Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South

With this it will be convenient to discuss Government amendments 496 and 497.

Photo of Simon Burns Simon Burns The Minister of State, Department of Health

The clause provides powers for the Secretary of State to direct Monitor when he considers that it is failing or has failed to perform a function. The Secretary of State may direct it to carry out the functions within a  specified time frame or, when Monitor fails to comply with such a direction, to carry out the functions himself or arrange for other persons to do so. The clause does not set out how that power should be exercised, and I am recommending these amendments so that that is made clear.

Monitor will be the economic regulator of health care services. We do not intend to compromise Monitor’s independence or undermine the benefits of economic regulation by allowing for political interference in its decision making. However, we need to strike a balance. Monitor will continue to be a non-departmental body, and, as such, we need to ensure its political accountability. The Secretary of State will be able to direct Monitor only in respect of significant failings in the performance of its functions, and will not be able to intervene in individual cases. Where the Secretary of State does intervene, he or she will be required to publish a statement on his or her reasons for doing so.

The amendments are needed to make the accountabilities clear and to ensure that Monitor is, as far as possible, independent and protected from political interference. At the same time, they will ensure that steps can be taken should there be significant failings by Monitor in the performance of its functions as an economic regulator. The amendments will also bring Monitor into line with the Government’s proposed overarching principles for economic regulation, which the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills published in January.

Question put, That the amendment be made.

The Committee divided: Ayes 13, Noes 10.

Division number 52 Decision Time — Clause 59

Aye: 13 MPs

No: 10 MPs

Aye: A-Z by last name

No: A-Z by last name

Question accordingly agreed to.

Amendment 495 agreed to.

Amendment proposed: 496, in clause 59, page 67, line 26, at end insert—

Question put, That the amendment be made.

The Committee divided: Ayes 13, Noes 10.

Division number 53 Decision Time — Clause 59

Aye: 13 MPs

No: 10 MPs

Aye: A-Z by last name

No: A-Z by last name

Question accordingly agreed to.

Amendment 496 agreed to.

Amendment proposed: 497, in clause 59, page 67, line 31, at end insert—

Question put, That the amendment be made.

The Committee divided: Ayes 13, Noes 10.

Division number 54 Decision Time — Clause 59

Aye: 13 MPs

No: 10 MPs

Aye: A-Z by last name

No: A-Z by last name

Question accordingly agreed to.

Amendment 497 agreed to.

Question put, That the clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill.

The Committee divided: Ayes 13, Noes 10.

Division number 55 Decision Time — Clause 59

Aye: 13 MPs

No: 10 MPs

Aye: A-Z by last name

No: A-Z by last name

Question accordingly agreed to.

Clause 59, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill.