Only a few days to go: We’re raising £25,000 to keep TheyWorkForYou running and make sure people across the UK can hold their elected representatives to account.Donate to our crowdfunder
These are probing amendments, but yes. If we were to have a jury on a Newton hearing, we would have to empanel the jury in rather the same way as one empanels a jury to decide if somebody is insane—in order to determine on the facts whether it was a terrorist-related matter. That is one issue. I was raising another issue, which is about the mechanism in a jury trial where an allegation is being made of a terrorist connection. How does one go about dealing with that in terms of the jury being able to indicate if it concludes, having heard all the evidence, that there is no terrorist connection?