Clause 34

Part of Climate Change Bill [Lords] – in a Public Bill Committee at 1:00 pm on 3rd July 2008.

Alert me about debates like this

Photo of Martin Horwood Martin Horwood Shadow Minister (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 1:00 pm, 3rd July 2008

It is good to be serving under your chairmanship this afternoon, Mr. Atkinson.

I am grateful to the Minister for her comments and her permission for me to talk to her officials during the break. However, I am afraid that both her remarks and those conversations reinforced my belief that while subsection (5), which gives the adaptation sub-committee the duty to provide expert advice, is being removed, nothing equivalent is being substituted. Government new clause 4, to which the Minister referred, puts in place a scrutiny duty subsequent to a Government programme for adaptation being developed, but I am afraid that I cannot see any equivalent to the core function of the adaptation sub-committee described in subsection (5) being replaced. I am afraid that I have to remain opposed to Government amendment No. 12.

The Minister has not addressed amendment No. 20 a great deal, but I shall comment on it in passing. During the recent debate in the Chamber on detention without charge or trial for 42 days, new clauses to the Counter-Terrorism Bill were moved allowing the Secretary of State, on making an order under powers to declare reserved power exercisable, to

“forthwith notify...the chairman of the Home Affairs Committee of the House of Commons...the chairman of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, and...the chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee”,

thereby giving statutory functions to Select Committees. There is a precedent for including Select Committees in statute and it should be followed in this case.