It would be helpful to discuss amendments Nos. 82, 83 and 84 together. They propose textual changes and relate to the same form of words in each case. There is a feeling that the words ''administers'' and ''administration'' do not sit comfortably in the clause. It is thought that they
could be open to litigation, and I have been advised that it would be clearer and more appropriate to leave out the word ''administers'' and simply concentrate on the word ''operates''. That is what the three amendments together seek to do.
Amendment No. 85 would add new subsection (4) at the end of clause 5. The amendment would allow a mechanism for the Secretary of State to clarify that certain activities do not fall within the definition of providing facilities for gambling. It is felt that that could be helpful and important, particularly for clarifying whether providing facilities for gambling includes, for example, a bank holding stake money, or a gambling operator, accountant or credit card company providing finance directly or indirectly for gambling. The amendment is an attempt to allow the Secretary of State to make regulations to define accurately and specifically those areas that are caught in the net and those that are not.
Debate adjourned.—[Mr. Watson.]
Adjourned accordingly at nine minutes to Five o'clock until Thursday 11 November at half-past Nine o'clock.