Rachel Maclean’s voting in Parliament

Rachel Maclean is a Conservative MP, and on the vast majority of issues votes the same way as other Conservative MPs.

However, Rachel Maclean sometimes differs from their party colleagues, such as:

• Rachel Maclean generally voted for laws to promote equality and human rights, while most Conservative MPs generally voted against. Show votes

We have lots more plain English analysis of Rachel Maclean’s voting record on issues like health, welfare, taxation and more. Visit Rachel Maclean’s full vote analysis page for more.

Rachel Maclean has hardly ever rebelled against their party in the current parliament. Find out more.

Recent appearances

• Debate on the Address: [1st Day] 14 Oct 2019

  One of the things my constituents care deeply about is social care, so I welcome the proposals set out in the Queen’s Speech. Does my right hon. Friend agree we must get Brexit done so that we can focus on the needs of the most vulnerable people in society?

• Preparations for Leaving the EU 8 Oct 2019

  According to the feedback from local businesses at a business event that I held in my constituency, the delay created by Opposition Members who are refusing to back the deal that the Government are negotiating is more damaging than the current state of affairs. Does my right hon. Friend agree with that?

• Preparations for Leaving the EU 8 Oct 2019

  According to the feedback from local businesses at a business event that I held in my constituency, the delay created by Opposition Members who are refusing to back the deal that the Government are negotiating is more damaging than the current state of affairs. Does my right hon. Friend agree with that?

More of Rachel Maclean’s recent appearances

RSS feed (?)

Profile

Conservative MP for Redditch

Entered the House of Commons on 9 June 2017 — General election

• Early Day Motions signed by this MP

Social Media

• @redditchrachel
• https://facebook.com/RedditchRachel

Expenses

• Expenses from 2010 onwards

Topics of interest

• Ministry of Justice
• Department of Health and Social Care
• Home Office
• Department for Transport
• Foreign and Commonwealth Office
• Post-mortems
• Patients: Transport
• Radicalism
• Menopause
• Operating Theatres: WiFi

Other offices held in the past

• Member, Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (11 Sep 2017 to 18 Jun 2018)

Previous MPs in this constituency

• Karen Lumley
• Jacqui Smith

Public bill committees (Sittings attended)

• Finance Bill Committee (6 out of 6)
• Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill Committee (6 out of 6)
• Stalking Protection Bill Committee (1 out of 1)
• Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill Committee (1 out of 1)
• Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill Committee (1 out of 1)
• Nuclear Safeguards Bill Committee (6 out of 6)
• Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill Committee (6 out of 6)
• Offensive Weapons Bill Committee (10 out of 10)
• Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill Committee (10 out of 10)
• Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee (6 out of 6)
• Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill Committee (1 out of 1)
• Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration Etc.) Bill Committee (1 out of 1)
• High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill Committee (2 out of 2)

Numerology

Please note that numbers do not measure quality. Also, representatives may do other things not currently covered by this site. More about this

• Has spoken in 126 debates in the last year — well above average amongst MPs. See all Rachel Maclean’s speeches
• Has received answers to 6 written questions in the last year — below average amongst MPs.
• Has voted in 92.38% of votes in this Parliament with this affiliation — well above average amongst MPs. (From Public Whip)
• This MP’s speeches, in Hansard, are readable by an average 16–17 year old, going by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score.
• 45 people are tracking this MP — email me updates on Rachel Maclean’s activity
• Has used three-word alliterative phrases (e.g. "she sells seashells") 168 times in debates — below average amongst MPs. (Why is this here?)