Recent Votes
This page shows Liz Saville-Roberts's most recent 20 votes.
For each vote you can see the vote in the context of the debate.
If they spoke in the same section as the vote, links to the speeches will be listed under the vote.
You can also see more analysis of individual votes through TheyWorkForYou Votes.
For a longer-term view of Liz Saville-Roberts's voting across different policy areas,
see their voting summary.
15 Apr 2026
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion relating to Lords Amendment 38
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 78
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 77
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 43
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 35
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 26
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 15
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Pensions Scheme Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Pension Schemes Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — Clause 1 - Respect orders
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 190 - Proscription status of Iran-related entities: review
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 185 - Glorification of terrorism: removal of emulation requirement
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — Clause 167 - Power to make youth diversion orders
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 144 - Duration of closure notices and orders: extension
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 144 - Duration of closure notices and orders: extension
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted yes on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 122 - Designation and restriction of Extreme Criminal Protest Groups
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — After Clause 9 - Seizure of vehicles in connection with a fly-tipping offence
-
On 15 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) — Clause 9 - Guidance on fly-tipping enforcement in England
14 Apr 2026
-
On 14 Apr 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
25 Mar 2026
-
On 25 Mar 2026:
Liz Saville-Roberts voted no on Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
As a result of COVID-19, some MPs were less able to vote in Parliament in certain periods, and this will be reflected by absences in their voting record.
- 11th May to 2nd June 2020
-
All MPs could vote remotely through an online voting tool. Votes cast remotely are shown as normal on the TheyWorkForYou voting record.
- 2nd to 9th June 2020
-
The option of online voting was removed, and a number of MPs may have been unable to vote because they were not physically able to attend.
- 10th June 2020 onwards
-
The requirements on proxy voting were relaxed, allowing MPs to designate another MP to cast a vote on their behalf.
If an MP votes by proxy, it is effectively exactly the same as if they cast the vote in person and it shows up on their TheyWorkForYou voting record.
MPs are not required to designate a proxy, and may instead pair with an opposing MP to miss a vote. Parliament does not record when two MPs have come to a pairing arrangement, so on TheyWorkForYou, they will both appear to have been absent for the vote.
See more detail on votes during the COVID-19 period here.
Note for journalists and researchers: The data on this page may be used freely, on condition that TheyWorkForYou.com is cited as the source.
This data was produced by TheyWorkForYou from a variety of sources.
For an explanation of the vote descriptions please see our page about voting information on TheyWorkForYou.
Profile photo: © Parliament (CC-BY 3.0)
