Trident Nuclear Weapons System Replacement
The UK's Trident nuclear weapons system, comprising missile armed submarines, provides a continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent. There have been votes on if the system should be replaced with a new nuclear deterrent when Trident reaches the end of its lifespan.
UK Ministry of Defence
John Nicolson consistently voted against replacing Trident with a new nuclear weapons system
TheyWorkForYou has automatically calculated this MP’s stance based on all
of their votes on the topic. You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk.
On 18 Jul 2016:
John Nicolson voted against replacing the four Trident nuclear missile submarines; the proposal for replacement was intended to maintain the UK's continuous at sea nuclear deterrent.
On 26 May 2016:
John Nicolson voted to call for the Government to outline a positive vision for the UK’s continued membership of the EU; against spending £200 billion on new nuclear weapons; in favour of abolishing the House of Lords; in favour of meaningful devolution to the nations and regions of the UK and in favour of contributing to the resolution of the refugee crisis in Europe.
On 24 Nov 2015:
John Nicolson voted against renewing the Trident nuclear deterrent programme.
On 4 Jun 2015:
John Nicolson voted against proposed spending cuts and changes to the welfare system and against spending on new nuclear weapons.
Note for journalists and researchers: The data on this page may be used freely,
on condition that TheyWorkForYou.com is cited as the source.
For an explanation of the vote descriptions please see our page about
voting information on TheyWorkForYou.