Security Sensitive Evidence in Courts
There have been votes in Parliament on if there should be a mechanism for material deemed national security sensitive to be made available to a civil court and a special advocate but not parties to the case. The mechanism is called the "closed material procedure".
Photo:
Alba Palacios
Priti Patel generally voted for allowing national security sensitive evidence to be put before courts in secret sessions
To suggest amendments or new votes for inclusion, please use this feedback form.
TheyWorkForYou has calculated this MP’s stance based on votes we have grouped on this topic. Learn more.
You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk. We are in the process of moving away from using the PublicWhip and there may be some discrepancies between the two sites.
-
On 17 Jul 2013:
Priti Patel voted in favour of rules implementing the introduction of "closed material proceedings" to the civil courts in Northern Ireland; the procedure involves making material deemed national security-sensitive available to the court and a special advocate but not parties to the case.
Show vote
-
On 17 Jul 2013:
Priti Patel voted in favour of rules implementing the introduction of "closed material proceedings" to courts; the procedure involves making material deemed national security-sensitive available to the court and a special advocate but not parties to the case.
Show vote
-
On 7 Mar 2013:
Priti Patel voted to allow material deemed national security-sensitive to be made available to a civil court and a special advocate but not parties to the case; to strengthen oversight of intelligence and security activities in Government; and to permit intercept evidence in closed proceedings in employment cases before tribunals.
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Clause 6 — Closed Material Proceedings Only If Fair Determination Not Possible By Other Means
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Clause 8 — Balance National Security vs Public Interest in Requests to Withhold Information From Parties in Civil Court Cases
Show vote
-
On 18 Dec 2012:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Second Reading
Show vote
-
On 4 Mar 2013:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Justice and Security Bill — Clause 6 — Balance Interests of Justice With Harm to National Security — Closed Material Proceedings
Show vote
Note for journalists and researchers: The data on this page may be used freely, on condition that TheyWorkForYou.com is cited as the source.
This data was produced by TheyWorkForYou from a variety of sources.
For an explanation of the vote descriptions please see our page about voting information on TheyWorkForYou.
Profile photo: © Parliament (CC-BY 3.0)
