Military Covenant
The armed forces covenant sets out the relationship between the nation, the government and the armed forces. It recognises the nation's moral obligation to members of the armed forces and their families. MPs have voted on the extent to which there should be special provisions for current, and former, service personnel in relation to public services.
Photo:
UK Ministry of Defence
Priti Patel generally voted against strengthening the Military Covenant
To suggest amendments or new votes for inclusion, please use this feedback form.
TheyWorkForYou has calculated this MP’s stance based on votes we have grouped on this topic. Learn more.
You can browse the source
data on PublicWhip.org.uk. We are in the process of moving away from using the PublicWhip and there may be some discrepancies between the two sites.
-
On 1 Mar 2022:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on National Insurance Contributions Bill — Clause 7 — Veteran Conditions
Show vote
-
On 7 Dec 2021:
Priti Patel voted not to waive immigration and nationality related fees for non UK citizens in the UK armed forces who have served for at least five years, and their dependents.
Show vote
-
On 6 Dec 2021:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Armed Forces Bill — Clause 8 — Armed Forces Covenant
Show vote
-
On 23 Jun 2021:
Priti Patel voted not to require central government departments to have due regard to the special situation of current or former members of the armed services when carrying out certain functions relating to housing, education and health in England.
Show vote
-
On 23 Jun 2021:
Priti Patel voted not to require accommodation provided to service people in Scotland to meet the Scottish Housing Quality Standard, the main measure of housing quality in Scotland.
Show vote
-
On 23 Jun 2021:
Priti Patel voted not to cap immigration and nationality related fees at level of the actual cost for citizens of Commonwealth countries who have who have served at least four years in the UK armed forces and for anyone who has served at least four years in the Brigade of Gurkhas.
Show vote
-
On 27 Apr 2021:
Priti Patel voted against establishing a duty of care standard in relation to legal, pastoral and mental health support provided to service personnel involved in investigations or litigation arising from overseas operations.
Show vote
-
On 21 Apr 2021:
Priti Patel voted against establishing a duty of care standard in relation to legal, pastoral and mental health support provided to service personnel involved in investigations or litigation arising from overseas operations.
Show vote
-
On 21 Apr 2021:
Priti Patel voted not to exclude actions against the UK brought by serving or former members of the armed services from proposed, more restrictive, time limits on actions in respect of personal injuries, death or human rights claims which relate to overseas operations of the armed forces.
Show vote
-
On 3 Nov 2020:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill — New Clause 5 — Restrictions on Time Limits: Actions Brought Against the Crown by Service Personnel
Show vote
-
On 3 Nov 2020:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill — Clause 6 — “Relevant offence” — Prosecution Required Under International Treaty Obligations
Show vote
-
On 3 Nov 2020:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill — Schedule 1 — Excluded Offences For the Purposes of Section 6 — Torture
Show vote
-
On 3 Nov 2020:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill — Third Reading — Presumption Against Prosecution
Show vote
-
On 23 Sep 2020:
Priti Patel was absent for a vote on Overseas Operations (Service Personnel And Veterans) Bill — Presumption Against Prosecution — Second Reading
Show vote
-
On 14 Jun 2011:
Priti Patel voted against requiring public bodies and minsters to consider the effects of people's service in the armed forces when setting healthcare, education and housing policy and to consider if special provisions for current, and former, service personnel are justified.
Show vote
Note for journalists and researchers: The data on this page may be used freely, on condition that TheyWorkForYou.com is cited as the source.
This data was produced by TheyWorkForYou from a variety of sources.
For an explanation of the vote descriptions please see our page about voting information on TheyWorkForYou.
Profile photo: © Parliament (CC-BY 3.0)